木炭基和非木炭基用手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的比较:临床研究

S. Janakiram, M. Muthuraj, K. Chithresan, Praveen Krishna Maddur, Megha Madhusoodanan
{"title":"木炭基和非木炭基用手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的比较:临床研究","authors":"S. Janakiram, M. Muthuraj, K. Chithresan, Praveen Krishna Maddur, Megha Madhusoodanan","doi":"10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The studyaimed to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a novel- charcoal-based and a non-charcoal-based manual toothbrush of standardised toothbrush design.\n\nMaterials And Methods: Sixteen undergraduate students of Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and hospital, Coimbatore, were included in this clinical study. This is a randomised clinical trial with a split-mouth design in which the quadrants that undergo tooth brushing using charcoal-based (test) and non-charcoal-based (control) toothbrushes are randomly selected by tossing a coin. The subjects were asked to refrain from all kinds of oral hygiene practices for 48 hours, following which pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores were evaluated by Turesky Gilmore modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index using a two-tone disclosing solution. Tooth brushing was performed by the examiner for a standard time (45sec/quadrant) using the Modified Bass brushing technique with fluoridated toothpaste. \n\nResults: The study's results showed no statistical significance between the values. However, the correlation between the total plaque scores and the assigned toothbrushes was also analysed, and a positive correlation was observed between the total plaque score and the test toothbrush.\n\nConclusion:\nThe plaque removal efficacy of charcoal bristled manual toothbrushes with 0.01mm diameter was found to be more or less the same compared with the similar non-charcoal-based counterpoint (1.89,1.39) respectively.\n\nKey-words: Charcoal-based toothbrush, Modified Bass brushing technique","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Charcoal Based and Non Charcoal Based Manual Toothbrushes: A Clinical Study\",\"authors\":\"S. Janakiram, M. Muthuraj, K. Chithresan, Praveen Krishna Maddur, Megha Madhusoodanan\",\"doi\":\"10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The studyaimed to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a novel- charcoal-based and a non-charcoal-based manual toothbrush of standardised toothbrush design.\\n\\nMaterials And Methods: Sixteen undergraduate students of Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and hospital, Coimbatore, were included in this clinical study. This is a randomised clinical trial with a split-mouth design in which the quadrants that undergo tooth brushing using charcoal-based (test) and non-charcoal-based (control) toothbrushes are randomly selected by tossing a coin. The subjects were asked to refrain from all kinds of oral hygiene practices for 48 hours, following which pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores were evaluated by Turesky Gilmore modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index using a two-tone disclosing solution. Tooth brushing was performed by the examiner for a standard time (45sec/quadrant) using the Modified Bass brushing technique with fluoridated toothpaste. \\n\\nResults: The study's results showed no statistical significance between the values. However, the correlation between the total plaque scores and the assigned toothbrushes was also analysed, and a positive correlation was observed between the total plaque score and the test toothbrush.\\n\\nConclusion:\\nThe plaque removal efficacy of charcoal bristled manual toothbrushes with 0.01mm diameter was found to be more or less the same compared with the similar non-charcoal-based counterpoint (1.89,1.39) respectively.\\n\\nKey-words: Charcoal-based toothbrush, Modified Bass brushing technique\",\"PeriodicalId\":76040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Indian Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较标准化设计的新型炭基手动牙刷和非炭基手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。材料与方法:选取哥印拜陀室利罗摩克里希纳牙科学院及医院的16名本科生进行临床研究。这是一项随机临床试验,采用开口设计,通过投掷硬币随机选择使用炭基牙刷(测试)和非炭基牙刷(对照)刷牙的象限。受试者被要求在48小时内停止各种口腔卫生习惯,然后使用双色披露液对刷前和刷后的牙菌斑评分进行评定。由检查者使用改良Bass刷牙技术和含氟牙膏进行标准时间(45秒/象限)的刷牙。结果:本研究结果无统计学意义。然而,我们也分析了菌斑总分与指定牙刷之间的相关性,发现菌斑总分与测试牙刷之间呈正相关。结论:直径0.01mm的炭刷与非炭刷的牙菌斑清除效果基本相同,分别为1.89、1.39。关键词:炭基牙刷;改良巴斯刷法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Charcoal Based and Non Charcoal Based Manual Toothbrushes: A Clinical Study
Background: The studyaimed to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a novel- charcoal-based and a non-charcoal-based manual toothbrush of standardised toothbrush design. Materials And Methods: Sixteen undergraduate students of Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and hospital, Coimbatore, were included in this clinical study. This is a randomised clinical trial with a split-mouth design in which the quadrants that undergo tooth brushing using charcoal-based (test) and non-charcoal-based (control) toothbrushes are randomly selected by tossing a coin. The subjects were asked to refrain from all kinds of oral hygiene practices for 48 hours, following which pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores were evaluated by Turesky Gilmore modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index using a two-tone disclosing solution. Tooth brushing was performed by the examiner for a standard time (45sec/quadrant) using the Modified Bass brushing technique with fluoridated toothpaste. Results: The study's results showed no statistical significance between the values. However, the correlation between the total plaque scores and the assigned toothbrushes was also analysed, and a positive correlation was observed between the total plaque score and the test toothbrush. Conclusion: The plaque removal efficacy of charcoal bristled manual toothbrushes with 0.01mm diameter was found to be more or less the same compared with the similar non-charcoal-based counterpoint (1.89,1.39) respectively. Key-words: Charcoal-based toothbrush, Modified Bass brushing technique
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信