岩土工程中的可持续性——它意味着什么?为什么重要?

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
L. von der Tann, D. Basu, Stefan Ritter, Paul Sverdrup Capellen, I. Størdal
{"title":"岩土工程中的可持续性——它意味着什么?为什么重要?","authors":"L. von der Tann, D. Basu, Stefan Ritter, Paul Sverdrup Capellen, I. Størdal","doi":"10.1680/jensu.22.00076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aspiration to act in a more sustainable manner has become a guiding principle across many aspects of life. Yet, sustainability is still often perceived as poorly defined, and there are diverse opinions on what the implications of sustainability for the everyday practice of geotechnical engineers are. On this background, this paper presents a survey conducted at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) in the beginning of 2021 that engaged a group of geotechnical engineers with the fundamental question as to how the concept of sustainability relates to geotechnical engineering. The Q-methodology, a mixed method approach, was applied to analyse different perspectives on sustainability in geotechnical engineering as inferred from the survey results. Three distinct perspectives were revealed that have a focus on (a) striving a balance between human action and nature, (b) mitigating adverse impacts of geotechnical projects, and (c) reducing resource use. Two of the perspectives considered the development of sustainability assessment tools as the most relevant means of working towards sustainable geotechnical practices whilst the third perspective considered multidisciplinary collaboration and research as more important. Reflection on these perspectives can help the development of future tools and strategies, provide a direction for future research, and contribute to a more sustainable geotechnical engineering practice.","PeriodicalId":49671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability in geotechnical engineering – what does it mean and why does that matter?\",\"authors\":\"L. von der Tann, D. Basu, Stefan Ritter, Paul Sverdrup Capellen, I. Størdal\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jensu.22.00076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aspiration to act in a more sustainable manner has become a guiding principle across many aspects of life. Yet, sustainability is still often perceived as poorly defined, and there are diverse opinions on what the implications of sustainability for the everyday practice of geotechnical engineers are. On this background, this paper presents a survey conducted at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) in the beginning of 2021 that engaged a group of geotechnical engineers with the fundamental question as to how the concept of sustainability relates to geotechnical engineering. The Q-methodology, a mixed method approach, was applied to analyse different perspectives on sustainability in geotechnical engineering as inferred from the survey results. Three distinct perspectives were revealed that have a focus on (a) striving a balance between human action and nature, (b) mitigating adverse impacts of geotechnical projects, and (c) reducing resource use. Two of the perspectives considered the development of sustainability assessment tools as the most relevant means of working towards sustainable geotechnical practices whilst the third perspective considered multidisciplinary collaboration and research as more important. Reflection on these perspectives can help the development of future tools and strategies, provide a direction for future research, and contribute to a more sustainable geotechnical engineering practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.22.00076\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.22.00076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以更可持续的方式行事的愿望已成为生活许多方面的指导原则。然而,可持续性仍然经常被认为是一个定义不明确的概念,关于可持续性对岩土工程师日常实践的影响有不同的观点。在此背景下,本文介绍了2021年初在挪威岩土研究所(NGI)进行的一项调查,该调查让一组岩土工程师参与了关于可持续性概念如何与岩土工程相关的基本问题。q -方法论是一种混合方法,应用于分析从调查结果推断的岩土工程可持续性的不同观点。揭示了三个不同的观点,重点是(a)努力在人类活动与自然之间取得平衡,(b)减轻岩土工程的不利影响,以及(c)减少资源使用。其中两个观点认为发展可持续性评估工具是实现可持续岩土工程实践的最相关手段,而第三个观点认为多学科合作和研究更为重要。对这些观点的反思有助于未来工具和策略的发展,为未来的研究提供方向,并有助于更可持续的岩土工程实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability in geotechnical engineering – what does it mean and why does that matter?
The aspiration to act in a more sustainable manner has become a guiding principle across many aspects of life. Yet, sustainability is still often perceived as poorly defined, and there are diverse opinions on what the implications of sustainability for the everyday practice of geotechnical engineers are. On this background, this paper presents a survey conducted at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) in the beginning of 2021 that engaged a group of geotechnical engineers with the fundamental question as to how the concept of sustainability relates to geotechnical engineering. The Q-methodology, a mixed method approach, was applied to analyse different perspectives on sustainability in geotechnical engineering as inferred from the survey results. Three distinct perspectives were revealed that have a focus on (a) striving a balance between human action and nature, (b) mitigating adverse impacts of geotechnical projects, and (c) reducing resource use. Two of the perspectives considered the development of sustainability assessment tools as the most relevant means of working towards sustainable geotechnical practices whilst the third perspective considered multidisciplinary collaboration and research as more important. Reflection on these perspectives can help the development of future tools and strategies, provide a direction for future research, and contribute to a more sustainable geotechnical engineering practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the ''how to'' of engineering a resilient future. The journal features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included. The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信