不同调制格式光纤传输系统中脉冲相互作用的比较研究

O. Sinkin, J. Zweck, C. Menyuk
{"title":"不同调制格式光纤传输系统中脉冲相互作用的比较研究","authors":"O. Sinkin, J. Zweck, C. Menyuk","doi":"10.1109/LEOS.2001.969250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the principal problems in the design of high-data rate optical fiber communications systems is the choice of the modulation format. The conventional non-return-to-zero (NRZ) format was the first format employed in optical fiber communications, and it remains the predominant modulation scheme at this time. The NRZ format has evolved into the chirped return-to-zero (CRZ) format, where both phase and amplitude modulation are used to improve the system performance. At the same time, there has been a considerable amount of work done to investigate the possibility of using classical solitons in optical fiber communications. The classical soliton format eventually evolved into the dispersion-managed soliton (DMS) format. Classical and dispersion-managed solitons are similar in important respects. For example, the balance between chromatic dispersion and nonlinearity is the key condition for the existence of periodically stationary dispersion-managed solitons. By contrast, the CRZ pulse shape is not periodic and the pulse evolution is mostly determined by the dispersion. However, we find that with respect to nonlinear pulse interactions, the DMS and CRZ systems resemble each other and their behavior differs dramatically from that of classical soliton systems. We stress that in our work here, when we refer to a DMS system, we mean a periodically-stationary DMS system, rather than a quasilinear DMS system. The quasilinear DMS systems resemble CRZ systems more than they resemble the periodically-stationary DMS systems. We demonstrate that in the DMS and CRZ systems, the performance degrades as the number of frequency channels increases, as opposed to classical soliton systems, where adding channels does not affect the performance.","PeriodicalId":18008,"journal":{"name":"LEOS 2001. 14th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (Cat. No.01CH37242)","volume":"30 1","pages":"216-217 vol.1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of pulse interactions in optical fiber transmission systems with different modulation formats\",\"authors\":\"O. Sinkin, J. Zweck, C. Menyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LEOS.2001.969250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the principal problems in the design of high-data rate optical fiber communications systems is the choice of the modulation format. The conventional non-return-to-zero (NRZ) format was the first format employed in optical fiber communications, and it remains the predominant modulation scheme at this time. The NRZ format has evolved into the chirped return-to-zero (CRZ) format, where both phase and amplitude modulation are used to improve the system performance. At the same time, there has been a considerable amount of work done to investigate the possibility of using classical solitons in optical fiber communications. The classical soliton format eventually evolved into the dispersion-managed soliton (DMS) format. Classical and dispersion-managed solitons are similar in important respects. For example, the balance between chromatic dispersion and nonlinearity is the key condition for the existence of periodically stationary dispersion-managed solitons. By contrast, the CRZ pulse shape is not periodic and the pulse evolution is mostly determined by the dispersion. However, we find that with respect to nonlinear pulse interactions, the DMS and CRZ systems resemble each other and their behavior differs dramatically from that of classical soliton systems. We stress that in our work here, when we refer to a DMS system, we mean a periodically-stationary DMS system, rather than a quasilinear DMS system. The quasilinear DMS systems resemble CRZ systems more than they resemble the periodically-stationary DMS systems. We demonstrate that in the DMS and CRZ systems, the performance degrades as the number of frequency channels increases, as opposed to classical soliton systems, where adding channels does not affect the performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEOS 2001. 14th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (Cat. No.01CH37242)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"216-217 vol.1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEOS 2001. 14th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (Cat. No.01CH37242)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2001.969250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEOS 2001. 14th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society (Cat. No.01CH37242)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2001.969250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

调制格式的选择是高数据速率光纤通信系统设计中的主要问题之一。传统的非归零(NRZ)格式是光纤通信中采用的第一种格式,并且在这个时候仍然是主要的调制方案。NRZ格式已经演变为啁啾归零(CRZ)格式,其中相位和幅度调制都用于改善系统性能。与此同时,人们已经做了大量的工作来研究在光纤通信中使用经典孤子的可能性。经典孤子格式最终演变为色散管理孤子(DMS)格式。经典孤子和分散管理孤子在一些重要方面是相似的。例如,色散和非线性之间的平衡是周期性平稳色散管理孤子存在的关键条件。相比之下,CRZ脉冲形状不具有周期性,脉冲演化主要由色散决定。然而,我们发现在非线性脉冲相互作用方面,DMS和CRZ系统彼此相似,它们的行为与经典孤子系统有很大的不同。我们强调在这里的工作中,当我们提到DMS系统时,我们指的是周期平稳的DMS系统,而不是拟线性的DMS系统。与周期平稳DMS系统相比,拟线性DMS系统更像CRZ系统。我们证明了在DMS和CRZ系统中,性能随着频率通道数量的增加而下降,而与经典孤子系统相反,在经典孤子系统中,增加通道不会影响性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of pulse interactions in optical fiber transmission systems with different modulation formats
One of the principal problems in the design of high-data rate optical fiber communications systems is the choice of the modulation format. The conventional non-return-to-zero (NRZ) format was the first format employed in optical fiber communications, and it remains the predominant modulation scheme at this time. The NRZ format has evolved into the chirped return-to-zero (CRZ) format, where both phase and amplitude modulation are used to improve the system performance. At the same time, there has been a considerable amount of work done to investigate the possibility of using classical solitons in optical fiber communications. The classical soliton format eventually evolved into the dispersion-managed soliton (DMS) format. Classical and dispersion-managed solitons are similar in important respects. For example, the balance between chromatic dispersion and nonlinearity is the key condition for the existence of periodically stationary dispersion-managed solitons. By contrast, the CRZ pulse shape is not periodic and the pulse evolution is mostly determined by the dispersion. However, we find that with respect to nonlinear pulse interactions, the DMS and CRZ systems resemble each other and their behavior differs dramatically from that of classical soliton systems. We stress that in our work here, when we refer to a DMS system, we mean a periodically-stationary DMS system, rather than a quasilinear DMS system. The quasilinear DMS systems resemble CRZ systems more than they resemble the periodically-stationary DMS systems. We demonstrate that in the DMS and CRZ systems, the performance degrades as the number of frequency channels increases, as opposed to classical soliton systems, where adding channels does not affect the performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信