FCC催化剂各种测试方法的比较评价

K. I. Dement’ev, T. A. Palankoev
{"title":"FCC催化剂各种测试方法的比较评价","authors":"K. I. Dement’ev, T. A. Palankoev","doi":"10.32758/2782-3040-2021-0-5-54-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses modern methods of stabilization and testing of the activity of cracking catalysts (FCC). Laboratory methods for evaluating cracking catalysts using fixed and fluidized bed reactors are compared, and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The correspondence of material balances of cracking was experimentally determined using various laboratory methods and a pilot plant with a riser reactor in comparison with data of industrial unit. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, recommendations are given for the most relevant testing of cracking catalysts.","PeriodicalId":23763,"journal":{"name":"World of petroleum products","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of various testing methods for FCC catalysts\",\"authors\":\"K. I. Dement’ev, T. A. Palankoev\",\"doi\":\"10.32758/2782-3040-2021-0-5-54-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses modern methods of stabilization and testing of the activity of cracking catalysts (FCC). Laboratory methods for evaluating cracking catalysts using fixed and fluidized bed reactors are compared, and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The correspondence of material balances of cracking was experimentally determined using various laboratory methods and a pilot plant with a riser reactor in comparison with data of industrial unit. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, recommendations are given for the most relevant testing of cracking catalysts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World of petroleum products\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World of petroleum products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32758/2782-3040-2021-0-5-54-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of petroleum products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32758/2782-3040-2021-0-5-54-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了裂化催化剂(FCC)稳定和活性测试的现代方法。比较了固定反应器和流化床反应器裂化催化剂的实验室评价方法,并讨论了它们的优缺点。采用多种实验室方法和立管反应器中试装置,与工业装置数据进行了对比,确定了裂化物料平衡的对应关系。在对实验结果进行分析的基础上,对裂化催化剂的相关试验提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of various testing methods for FCC catalysts
The article discusses modern methods of stabilization and testing of the activity of cracking catalysts (FCC). Laboratory methods for evaluating cracking catalysts using fixed and fluidized bed reactors are compared, and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The correspondence of material balances of cracking was experimentally determined using various laboratory methods and a pilot plant with a riser reactor in comparison with data of industrial unit. Based on the analysis of the results obtained, recommendations are given for the most relevant testing of cracking catalysts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信