鸡的啄顺序是如何测量的:一个批判性的评论

J. Rushen
{"title":"鸡的啄顺序是如何测量的:一个批判性的评论","authors":"J. Rushen","doi":"10.1016/0304-3762(84)90032-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The peck orders of chickens have been measured in many ways, and the question of which measure is most appropriate arises. This can only be answered in reference to the way that the measure is to be used. Staging paired contests between unacquainted birds is best used to assess the stable, intrinsic traits that underly dominance relationships. However, this method does not give reliable estimates of the relationships the birds form when grouped. The social environment of each bird is best assessed by observing the agonistic encounters that occur. However, the comparability of the different forms of aggressive behaviour needs to be established. Measures based upon priority of access to food cannot be used with confidence. Measures of rank need to be normally distributed and reflect the actual magnitude of the difference between birds only when these are to be used in assessing the underlying traits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100106,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90032-4","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How peck orders of chickens are measured: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"J. Rushen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3762(84)90032-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The peck orders of chickens have been measured in many ways, and the question of which measure is most appropriate arises. This can only be answered in reference to the way that the measure is to be used. Staging paired contests between unacquainted birds is best used to assess the stable, intrinsic traits that underly dominance relationships. However, this method does not give reliable estimates of the relationships the birds form when grouped. The social environment of each bird is best assessed by observing the agonistic encounters that occur. However, the comparability of the different forms of aggressive behaviour needs to be established. Measures based upon priority of access to food cannot be used with confidence. Measures of rank need to be normally distributed and reflect the actual magnitude of the difference between birds only when these are to be used in assessing the underlying traits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Ethology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90032-4\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304376284900324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304376284900324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

鸡的啄啄顺序已经用许多方法测量过了,而哪一种测量方法最合适的问题就产生了。这只能根据使用度量的方式来回答。在不熟悉的鸟类之间进行配对竞争是评估优势关系下稳定的内在特征的最佳方法。然而,这种方法不能可靠地估计鸟类在分组时形成的关系。每只鸟的社会环境最好通过观察发生的激烈相遇来评估。然而,需要确定不同形式的攻击行为的可比性。不能放心地使用基于优先获得食物的措施。等级的度量必须是正态分布的,并且只有在用于评估潜在特征时才能反映鸟类之间差异的实际大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How peck orders of chickens are measured: A critical review

The peck orders of chickens have been measured in many ways, and the question of which measure is most appropriate arises. This can only be answered in reference to the way that the measure is to be used. Staging paired contests between unacquainted birds is best used to assess the stable, intrinsic traits that underly dominance relationships. However, this method does not give reliable estimates of the relationships the birds form when grouped. The social environment of each bird is best assessed by observing the agonistic encounters that occur. However, the comparability of the different forms of aggressive behaviour needs to be established. Measures based upon priority of access to food cannot be used with confidence. Measures of rank need to be normally distributed and reflect the actual magnitude of the difference between birds only when these are to be used in assessing the underlying traits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信