{"title":"在这篇文章中，我们提出了一种新的方法，在这种方法中，研究人员和研究人员之间的关系是相互关联的。","authors":"Gabriela Gómez-Rodríguez, Arley Enrique Morrell, Cristina Gallo-Estrada","doi":"10.32870/CYS.V0I30.6838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Articles and essays published in Comunicacion y Sociedad from 2004 to 2016 are analyzed, seeking to show authorship, appointments and subject trends, as to reveal methodological and theoretical approaches that prevail in the communication field discussed in the journal. Using a content analysis we found that the critical approach is the most used in the studies, as well as the traditional methodologies.","PeriodicalId":35210,"journal":{"name":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","volume":"23 1","pages":"17-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 30 años de Comunicación y Sociedad: cambios y permanencias en el campo académico de la comunicación\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Gómez-Rodríguez, Arley Enrique Morrell, Cristina Gallo-Estrada\",\"doi\":\"10.32870/CYS.V0I30.6838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Articles and essays published in Comunicacion y Sociedad from 2004 to 2016 are analyzed, seeking to show authorship, appointments and subject trends, as to reveal methodological and theoretical approaches that prevail in the communication field discussed in the journal. Using a content analysis we found that the critical approach is the most used in the studies, as well as the traditional methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comunicacion y Sociedad\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"17-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comunicacion y Sociedad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32870/CYS.V0I30.6838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32870/CYS.V0I30.6838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
对2004年至2016年发表在《communication y Sociedad》上的文章和论文进行分析，试图显示作者身份、任命和主题趋势，以揭示该杂志讨论的传播领域的方法论和理论方法。通过内容分析，我们发现批判性方法和传统方法在研究中使用得最多。
A 30 años de Comunicación y Sociedad: cambios y permanencias en el campo académico de la comunicación
Articles and essays published in Comunicacion y Sociedad from 2004 to 2016 are analyzed, seeking to show authorship, appointments and subject trends, as to reveal methodological and theoretical approaches that prevail in the communication field discussed in the journal. Using a content analysis we found that the critical approach is the most used in the studies, as well as the traditional methodologies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
