伦理审判:评论

Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/15379418.2016.1219246

Toby G. Kleinman

{"title":"伦理审判:评论","authors":"Toby G. Kleinman","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2016.1219246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This comment reviews attorney and mental health duties to the court and their profession and discusses ways to have an impact on how information, known to be considered without scientific basis, “junk science” is put forth to courts and what can possibly be done to stop that.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics on trial: A comment\",\"authors\":\"Toby G. Kleinman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15379418.2016.1219246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This comment reviews attorney and mental health duties to the court and their profession and discusses ways to have an impact on how information, known to be considered without scientific basis, “junk science” is put forth to courts and what can possibly be done to stop that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Custody\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Custody\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2016.1219246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Custody","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2016.1219246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇评论回顾了律师和心理健康对法院及其职业的责任，并讨论了如何影响那些已知被认为没有科学依据的信息，“垃圾科学”向法院提出的方式，以及可能采取哪些措施来阻止这种情况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ethics on trial: A comment

ABSTRACT This comment reviews attorney and mental health duties to the court and their profession and discusses ways to have an impact on how information, known to be considered without scientific basis, “junk science” is put forth to courts and what can possibly be done to stop that.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Child Custody FAMILY STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since the days of Solomon, child custody issues have demanded extraordinary wisdom and insight. The Journal of Child Custody gives you access to the ideas, opinions, and experiences of leading experts in the field and keeps you up-to-date with the latest developments in the field as well as discussions elucidating complex legal and psychological issues. While it will not shy away from controversial topics and ideas, the Journal of Child Custody is committed to publishing accurate, balanced, and scholarly articles as well as insightful reviews of relevant books and literature.