{"title":"Gnesioi filoi: George Syncellus and Theophanes the Confessor – Addenda","authors":"Andrzej Kompa","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.12.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides the addenda to A. Kompa, Gnesioi filoi: the search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s own words, and the authorship of their oeuvre, Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155–230. All the expressions crucial to the stylistic and stylometric argument on the authorship of the Chronography of Theophanes have been updated after 7 years and verified in the expanded TLG database. The updated results are presented below. The conclusions confirm the previous opinions on the individual, singular authorship of the chronicle of Theophanes with differences in style from the first part of the universal history, written by George Syncellus. At the same time, both works should be treated as a single project, and the prooimion to Theophanes’ part as a sound base faor the reconstruction of the writing process. The clauses ὡς προέφην, καθὼς καὶ προέφην, ὡς προέφημεν, and καθὼς προέφημεν are specific to the Chronography of Theophanes in their frequency and diversity, but they seem to be known and used by the circles from which Theophanes acquired his literary skills.","PeriodicalId":41598,"journal":{"name":"SEARCH-Journal of the Southeast Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEARCH-Journal of the Southeast Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.12.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文提供了A. Kompa的附录,《Gnesioi filoi:寻找George Syncellus和Theophanes The Confessor的自己的话,以及他们的作品的作者》,Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155-230。所有对《提奥芬年表》作者身份的文体和文体计量学争论至关重要的表达都在7年后更新,并在扩展的TLG数据库中得到验证。更新后的结果如下。结论证实了之前的意见,个人,单一作者的编年史的西奥芬与风格不同的第一部分的普遍历史,由乔治辛塞勒斯写的。同时,这两部作品应该被视为一个单一的项目,对提奥芬的部分的提供作为一个健全的基础,有利于写作过程的重建。这些子句的出现频率和多样性都是《提奥法尼年表》中所特有的,即:κ ς προ ν, καθ ς κα ς πρ ν,和καθ ο ς πρ ν,但似乎是提奥法尼获得文学技巧的圈子所知道和使用的。
Gnesioi filoi: George Syncellus and Theophanes the Confessor – Addenda
The paper provides the addenda to A. Kompa, Gnesioi filoi: the search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s own words, and the authorship of their oeuvre, Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155–230. All the expressions crucial to the stylistic and stylometric argument on the authorship of the Chronography of Theophanes have been updated after 7 years and verified in the expanded TLG database. The updated results are presented below. The conclusions confirm the previous opinions on the individual, singular authorship of the chronicle of Theophanes with differences in style from the first part of the universal history, written by George Syncellus. At the same time, both works should be treated as a single project, and the prooimion to Theophanes’ part as a sound base faor the reconstruction of the writing process. The clauses ὡς προέφην, καθὼς καὶ προέφην, ὡς προέφημεν, and καθὼς προέφημεν are specific to the Chronography of Theophanes in their frequency and diversity, but they seem to be known and used by the circles from which Theophanes acquired his literary skills.