在量子力学的模态解释中支持与反对形而上学

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2010-01-02 DOI:10.21825/philosophica.82162

Christian de Ronde

{"title":"在量子力学的模态解释中支持与反对形而上学","authors":"Christian de Ronde","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss the relation of quantum theory to the problem of metaphysics. Based on metaphysical and anti-metaphysical stances, we put forward an ‘interpretational map’ of quantum mechanics in general and of the modal interpretation in particular. Thus, within the modal interpretation, we distinguish between: Modal Interpretations (which start from) the Mathematical Formalism (MIMF) and Modal Interpretations (which start from) Metaphysical Principles (MIMP). Finally, we argue for a middle path in between metaphysical principles and the formal conditions imposed on quantum mechanics.","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"For and Against Metaphysics in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechancis\",\"authors\":\"Christian de Ronde\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/philosophica.82162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss the relation of quantum theory to the problem of metaphysics. Based on metaphysical and anti-metaphysical stances, we put forward an ‘interpretational map’ of quantum mechanics in general and of the modal interpretation in particular. Thus, within the modal interpretation, we distinguish between: Modal Interpretations (which start from) the Mathematical Formalism (MIMF) and Modal Interpretations (which start from) Metaphysical Principles (MIMP). Finally, we argue for a middle path in between metaphysical principles and the formal conditions imposed on quantum mechanics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

本文讨论了量子论与形而上学问题的关系。基于形而上学和反形而上学的立场，我们提出了量子力学的一般解释图，特别是模态解释图。因此，在模态解释中，我们区分了:模态解释(从数学形式主义(MIMF)开始)和模态解释(从形而上学原理(MIMP)开始)。最后，我们主张在形而上学原理和强加于量子力学的形式条件之间有一条中间道路。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

For and Against Metaphysics in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechancis

In this paper we discuss the relation of quantum theory to the problem of metaphysics. Based on metaphysical and anti-metaphysical stances, we put forward an ‘interpretational map’ of quantum mechanics in general and of the modal interpretation in particular. Thus, within the modal interpretation, we distinguish between: Modal Interpretations (which start from) the Mathematical Formalism (MIMF) and Modal Interpretations (which start from) Metaphysical Principles (MIMP). Finally, we argue for a middle path in between metaphysical principles and the formal conditions imposed on quantum mechanics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Argumenta Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量