差分进化算法中不同突变策略用于集总水平衡模型标定的实验

U. Okkan, Umut Kirdemir
{"title":"差分进化算法中不同突变策略用于集总水平衡模型标定的实验","authors":"U. Okkan, Umut Kirdemir","doi":"10.36287/setsci.4.6.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is one featured kind of population based evolutionary algorithms. Although it is stated in previous studies that the algorithm is more sensitive to the crossover rate, it is tried out in this study whether DEA depends on mutation operation in which scaled differences of randomly chosen individuals existed in the population are used. Within this context, the presented study aims to carry out an empirical assessment regarding the comparison of DEA with the different mutation strategies for the calibration phase of a lumped water balance model. Both stable solution availabilities and convergence capabilities of DEA variants operated through five mutation approaches were performed on four parameterThorthwaite water balance model prepared for Gordes watershed. The findings derived from the model calibrations have indicated the usage of the fifth mutation strategy termed as current to best mutation strategy, which is more predominant in guaranteeing the achievement of stable solutions.","PeriodicalId":6817,"journal":{"name":"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiment of Different Mutation Strategies in Differential Evolution Algorithm Employed for Calibration of a Lumped Water Balance Model\",\"authors\":\"U. Okkan, Umut Kirdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.36287/setsci.4.6.086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is one featured kind of population based evolutionary algorithms. Although it is stated in previous studies that the algorithm is more sensitive to the crossover rate, it is tried out in this study whether DEA depends on mutation operation in which scaled differences of randomly chosen individuals existed in the population are used. Within this context, the presented study aims to carry out an empirical assessment regarding the comparison of DEA with the different mutation strategies for the calibration phase of a lumped water balance model. Both stable solution availabilities and convergence capabilities of DEA variants operated through five mutation approaches were performed on four parameterThorthwaite water balance model prepared for Gordes watershed. The findings derived from the model calibrations have indicated the usage of the fifth mutation strategy termed as current to best mutation strategy, which is more predominant in guaranteeing the achievement of stable solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"4th International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.4.6.086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

差分进化算法(DEA)是一种基于种群的进化算法。虽然以往的研究表明该算法对交叉率更为敏感,但本研究尝试DEA是否依赖于突变操作,使用种群中随机选择个体的比例差异。在此背景下,本研究旨在对DEA与集总水平衡模型校准阶段不同突变策略的比较进行实证评估。对Gordes流域的四参数thorthwaite水平衡模型进行了五种突变方法操作的DEA变量的稳定解可用性和收敛能力分析。从模型校准中得出的结果表明,第五种突变策略被称为当前到最佳突变策略,它在保证获得稳定解方面更占优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiment of Different Mutation Strategies in Differential Evolution Algorithm Employed for Calibration of a Lumped Water Balance Model
Differential evolution algorithm (DEA) is one featured kind of population based evolutionary algorithms. Although it is stated in previous studies that the algorithm is more sensitive to the crossover rate, it is tried out in this study whether DEA depends on mutation operation in which scaled differences of randomly chosen individuals existed in the population are used. Within this context, the presented study aims to carry out an empirical assessment regarding the comparison of DEA with the different mutation strategies for the calibration phase of a lumped water balance model. Both stable solution availabilities and convergence capabilities of DEA variants operated through five mutation approaches were performed on four parameterThorthwaite water balance model prepared for Gordes watershed. The findings derived from the model calibrations have indicated the usage of the fifth mutation strategy termed as current to best mutation strategy, which is more predominant in guaranteeing the achievement of stable solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信