马克·吐温小说《汤姆·索亚历险记》中的格赖斯违犯格言分析

IF 0.3 0 LITERATURE
Robby Anouvali Taufiq, L. Marlina
{"title":"马克·吐温小说《汤姆·索亚历险记》中的格赖斯违犯格言分析","authors":"Robby Anouvali Taufiq, L. Marlina","doi":"10.24036/ell.v11i3.118205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theory cooperative principle work as a guideline that instructs people to interact with one another constructively and cooperatively. Grice P. is the one who wrote and delivered it in 1975. The cooperative principle is divided into four types of maxims which are quantity (amount of information), quality (the validity of information), relation (relatability of information), and manner (information delivery). However, there are times when the speaker tries to misguide the listener, and it is called a violation of the maxim principle. It is a maxim created to trick the listener into believing something false while the listener is ignorant of it. Additionally, it creates a problem for linguists since implicature, one of the issues in the field of linguistics, notably pragmatics, is linked to the violation. It happens not only in real-world conversation but also in literary work for example novels. This research examines the maxims that the protagonist of the novel The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1993) violated. A famous novel by famous American writer Mark Twain which tells about Tom Sawyer’s misbehavior and his escapade. Random data sampling is used to collect the data from the source of data to determine the association between one maxim violation and another. The data was collected from statements made by Thomas Sawyer, the book's main character, and various supporting characters in 9 of the novel's 35 chapters. To examine the data from the novel The Adventure of Tom Sawyer, Grice's cooperative principle theory from 1975 is employed, as well as Tupan and Natalia's maxim violation indicator (2008). This analysis found that out of 360 total utterances in 9 chapters, there are only three maxim violations in The Adventure of Tom Sawyer: the violation of quality maxim, relation maxim, and number maxim. 14 infractions of 18 utterances, driven by two indicators, represent 66 percent of the quality maxim violation (lies and denies something). The quantity maxim shows 10% occurrence (2 violations out of 18 utterances dominated by two indicators). In comparison, the relation maxim shows 24 percent occurrence (5 violations out of 18 utterances with each utterance dominating all of the indicators (unmatched topic, avoid something, hides a fact, and the wrong causality)) (uninformative, and talk too much). As a result, The Adventure of Tom Sawyer contains claims that mostly violate the quality and relational maxims. ","PeriodicalId":42230,"journal":{"name":"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Grice’s Violation Maxim in Mark Twain’s Novel the Adventure of Tom Sawyer (1993)\",\"authors\":\"Robby Anouvali Taufiq, L. Marlina\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ell.v11i3.118205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theory cooperative principle work as a guideline that instructs people to interact with one another constructively and cooperatively. Grice P. is the one who wrote and delivered it in 1975. The cooperative principle is divided into four types of maxims which are quantity (amount of information), quality (the validity of information), relation (relatability of information), and manner (information delivery). However, there are times when the speaker tries to misguide the listener, and it is called a violation of the maxim principle. It is a maxim created to trick the listener into believing something false while the listener is ignorant of it. Additionally, it creates a problem for linguists since implicature, one of the issues in the field of linguistics, notably pragmatics, is linked to the violation. It happens not only in real-world conversation but also in literary work for example novels. This research examines the maxims that the protagonist of the novel The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1993) violated. A famous novel by famous American writer Mark Twain which tells about Tom Sawyer’s misbehavior and his escapade. Random data sampling is used to collect the data from the source of data to determine the association between one maxim violation and another. The data was collected from statements made by Thomas Sawyer, the book's main character, and various supporting characters in 9 of the novel's 35 chapters. To examine the data from the novel The Adventure of Tom Sawyer, Grice's cooperative principle theory from 1975 is employed, as well as Tupan and Natalia's maxim violation indicator (2008). This analysis found that out of 360 total utterances in 9 chapters, there are only three maxim violations in The Adventure of Tom Sawyer: the violation of quality maxim, relation maxim, and number maxim. 14 infractions of 18 utterances, driven by two indicators, represent 66 percent of the quality maxim violation (lies and denies something). The quantity maxim shows 10% occurrence (2 violations out of 18 utterances dominated by two indicators). In comparison, the relation maxim shows 24 percent occurrence (5 violations out of 18 utterances with each utterance dominating all of the indicators (unmatched topic, avoid something, hides a fact, and the wrong causality)) (uninformative, and talk too much). As a result, The Adventure of Tom Sawyer contains claims that mostly violate the quality and relational maxims. \",\"PeriodicalId\":42230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v11i3.118205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v11i3.118205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论合作原则是指导人们建设性地、合作地相互作用的准则。Grice P.是1975年写并发表这篇文章的人。合作原则分为四类准则,即数量(信息量)、质量(信息的有效性)、关系(信息的相关性)和方式(信息的传递)。然而,有时说话者试图误导听者,这被称为违反格言原则。这是一句格言,用来欺骗听者在听者不知情的情况下相信一些错误的东西。此外,这给语言学家带来了一个问题,因为语言学领域的一个问题,特别是语用学,与这种违反有关。它不仅发生在现实世界的对话中,也发生在文学作品中,比如小说。本研究考察了小说《汤姆·索亚历险记》(1993)的主人公所违反的格言。美国著名作家马克·吐温的一部著名小说,讲述了汤姆·索亚的不当行为和他的出轨行为。采用随机数据抽样的方法从数据源收集数据,以确定一个最大值违反与另一个最大值违反之间的关联。这些数据是从小说35章中的9章中主人公托马斯·索亚和各种配角的陈述中收集的。为了检验小说《汤姆·索亚历险记》中的数据,我们采用了Grice 1975年的合作原则理论,以及Tupan和Natalia的违背准则指标(2008)。分析发现,在《汤姆·索亚历险记》9章共360个话语中,只有3个违背了品质准则、关系准则和数量准则。在两个指标的驱动下,18个话语中有14个违规,占质量准则违规(谎言和否认)的66%。数量准则的出现率为10%(2个指标占主导地位的18个话语中有2个违反)。相比之下,关系准则的出现率为24%(18个话语中有5个违反,每个话语主导所有指标(不匹配的话题,避免某事,隐藏事实,错误的因果关系))(信息不丰富,说话太多)。因此,《汤姆·索亚历险记》包含的主张大多违反了质量和关系准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Grice’s Violation Maxim in Mark Twain’s Novel the Adventure of Tom Sawyer (1993)
Theory cooperative principle work as a guideline that instructs people to interact with one another constructively and cooperatively. Grice P. is the one who wrote and delivered it in 1975. The cooperative principle is divided into four types of maxims which are quantity (amount of information), quality (the validity of information), relation (relatability of information), and manner (information delivery). However, there are times when the speaker tries to misguide the listener, and it is called a violation of the maxim principle. It is a maxim created to trick the listener into believing something false while the listener is ignorant of it. Additionally, it creates a problem for linguists since implicature, one of the issues in the field of linguistics, notably pragmatics, is linked to the violation. It happens not only in real-world conversation but also in literary work for example novels. This research examines the maxims that the protagonist of the novel The Adventures of Tom Sawyer (1993) violated. A famous novel by famous American writer Mark Twain which tells about Tom Sawyer’s misbehavior and his escapade. Random data sampling is used to collect the data from the source of data to determine the association between one maxim violation and another. The data was collected from statements made by Thomas Sawyer, the book's main character, and various supporting characters in 9 of the novel's 35 chapters. To examine the data from the novel The Adventure of Tom Sawyer, Grice's cooperative principle theory from 1975 is employed, as well as Tupan and Natalia's maxim violation indicator (2008). This analysis found that out of 360 total utterances in 9 chapters, there are only three maxim violations in The Adventure of Tom Sawyer: the violation of quality maxim, relation maxim, and number maxim. 14 infractions of 18 utterances, driven by two indicators, represent 66 percent of the quality maxim violation (lies and denies something). The quantity maxim shows 10% occurrence (2 violations out of 18 utterances dominated by two indicators). In comparison, the relation maxim shows 24 percent occurrence (5 violations out of 18 utterances with each utterance dominating all of the indicators (unmatched topic, avoid something, hides a fact, and the wrong causality)) (uninformative, and talk too much). As a result, The Adventure of Tom Sawyer contains claims that mostly violate the quality and relational maxims. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asiatic is the very first international journal on English writings by Asian writers and writers of Asian origin, currently being the only one of its kind. It aims to publish high-quality researches and outstanding creative works combining the broad fields of literature and linguistics on the same intellectual platform. Asiatic will contain a rich collection of selected articles on issues that deal with Asian Englishes, Asian cultures and Asian literatures in English, including diasporic literature and Asian literatures in translation. Articles may include studies that address the multidimensional impacts of the English Language on a wide variety of Asian cultures (South Asian, East Asian, Southeast Asian and others). Subjects of debates and discussions will encompass the socio-economic facet of the Asian world in relation to current academic investigations on literature, culture and linguistics. This approach will present the works of English-trained Asian writers and scholars, having English as the unifying device and Asia as a fundamental backdrop of their study. The three different segments that will be featured in each issue of Asiatic are: (i) critical writings on literary, cultural and linguistics studies, (ii) creative writings that include works of prose fiction and selections of poetry and (iv) review articles on Asian books, novels and plays produced in English (or translated into English). These works will reflect how elements of western and Asian are both subtly and intensely intertwined as a result of acculturation, globalisation and such.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信