商品质量保证与商品质量保证:关联与分界问题

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
E. F. Evseev
{"title":"商品质量保证与商品质量保证:关联与分界问题","authors":"E. F. Evseev","doi":"10.18572/2070-2140-2021-1-15-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the correlation between legal doctrines of merchantability warranty of goods and assurances of quality of goods as a particular case of assurances of circumstances. The possible similarities, but especially differences, have been pointed out. The position of necessity of their identification and differentiation has been presented. The paper also describes the difference between the legal consequences of a breach of the merchantability warranty and the quality assurance as well as some other differences in the legal regulation arising from their correlation.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goods Quality Guarantee and Goods Quality Assurance: The Correlation and Demarcation Issue\",\"authors\":\"E. F. Evseev\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2140-2021-1-15-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we study the correlation between legal doctrines of merchantability warranty of goods and assurances of quality of goods as a particular case of assurances of circumstances. The possible similarities, but especially differences, have been pointed out. The position of necessity of their identification and differentiation has been presented. The paper also describes the difference between the legal consequences of a breach of the merchantability warranty and the quality assurance as well as some other differences in the legal regulation arising from their correlation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2021-1-15-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2021-1-15-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以情况保证为例,研究了货物适销性保证与货物质量保证的法律原则之间的关系。可能的相似之处,尤其是不同之处,已经被指出。提出了对二者进行鉴别和区分的必要性。本文还介绍了违反适销性保证和质量保证的法律后果的区别,以及它们之间的关联所引起的法律规制的其他一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Goods Quality Guarantee and Goods Quality Assurance: The Correlation and Demarcation Issue
In this paper, we study the correlation between legal doctrines of merchantability warranty of goods and assurances of quality of goods as a particular case of assurances of circumstances. The possible similarities, but especially differences, have been pointed out. The position of necessity of their identification and differentiation has been presented. The paper also describes the difference between the legal consequences of a breach of the merchantability warranty and the quality assurance as well as some other differences in the legal regulation arising from their correlation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信