人格组织特质与预期反移情及治疗干预

M GordonRobert, ValeriyaSpektor, L. Linh
{"title":"人格组织特质与预期反移情及治疗干预","authors":"M GordonRobert, ValeriyaSpektor, L. Linh","doi":"10.23937/2572-4037.1510039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is little empirical research on patients at the severe level of personality organization who generally need more clarifications of roles, tasks, boundaries, and supportive interventions, and often create increased problems with countertransference. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinicians’ ratings of their new patients’ level of personality organization traits (i.e.: Defensiveness, identity integration, object relations, and reality testing) and degree of expected countertransference and treatment interventions. Method: We surveyed 509 Clinicians about their reactions to a recently seen patient. Results: We found that the more severe the level of personality organization traits: 1. The more expected need for ongoing clarification of roles and tasks throughout the course of treatment; 2. The more clinicians’ expectation of their patients being confused about boundaries; 3. The more expected negative countertransference; 4. The more expected need for supportive interventions. Conclusion: These findings point out the importance for clinicians to accurately assess and understand their patients’ level of personality organization in order to intervene appropriately regardless of theoretical orientation.","PeriodicalId":91098,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Organization Traits and Expected Countertransference and Treatment Interventions\",\"authors\":\"M GordonRobert, ValeriyaSpektor, L. Linh\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2572-4037.1510039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is little empirical research on patients at the severe level of personality organization who generally need more clarifications of roles, tasks, boundaries, and supportive interventions, and often create increased problems with countertransference. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinicians’ ratings of their new patients’ level of personality organization traits (i.e.: Defensiveness, identity integration, object relations, and reality testing) and degree of expected countertransference and treatment interventions. Method: We surveyed 509 Clinicians about their reactions to a recently seen patient. Results: We found that the more severe the level of personality organization traits: 1. The more expected need for ongoing clarification of roles and tasks throughout the course of treatment; 2. The more clinicians’ expectation of their patients being confused about boundaries; 3. The more expected negative countertransference; 4. The more expected need for supportive interventions. Conclusion: These findings point out the importance for clinicians to accurately assess and understand their patients’ level of personality organization in order to intervene appropriately regardless of theoretical orientation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:目前对人格组织严重水平患者的实证研究很少,这些患者通常需要更多的角色、任务、边界和支持性干预的澄清,并且往往会增加反移情的问题。本研究旨在探讨临床医师对新患者人格组织特质(防卫性、身份整合、客体关系和现实测试)水平的评分与预期反移情程度和治疗干预之间的关系。方法:我们调查了509名临床医生对最近见到的病人的反应。结果:我们发现人格组织特质水平越严重:1。在整个治疗过程中,更需要不断澄清角色和任务;2. 临床医生越期望他们的病人对界限感到困惑;3.负反移情期望值越高;4. 对支持性干预措施的更多预期需求。结论:这些发现指出了临床医生准确评估和了解患者人格组织水平的重要性,以便在不考虑理论取向的情况下进行适当的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personality Organization Traits and Expected Countertransference and Treatment Interventions
Background: There is little empirical research on patients at the severe level of personality organization who generally need more clarifications of roles, tasks, boundaries, and supportive interventions, and often create increased problems with countertransference. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinicians’ ratings of their new patients’ level of personality organization traits (i.e.: Defensiveness, identity integration, object relations, and reality testing) and degree of expected countertransference and treatment interventions. Method: We surveyed 509 Clinicians about their reactions to a recently seen patient. Results: We found that the more severe the level of personality organization traits: 1. The more expected need for ongoing clarification of roles and tasks throughout the course of treatment; 2. The more clinicians’ expectation of their patients being confused about boundaries; 3. The more expected negative countertransference; 4. The more expected need for supportive interventions. Conclusion: These findings point out the importance for clinicians to accurately assess and understand their patients’ level of personality organization in order to intervene appropriately regardless of theoretical orientation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信