自由裁量空间和不兼容声明

Conall Mallory, H. Tyrrell
{"title":"自由裁量空间和不兼容声明","authors":"Conall Mallory, H. Tyrrell","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1975590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Human Rights Act (HRA) has long been hailed for solving the historic tension between judicial oversight of rights protection and democratic legitimacy through the ‘elegant’ and ‘ingenious schem...","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"15 1","pages":"466 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discretionary Space and Declarations of Incompatibility\",\"authors\":\"Conall Mallory, H. Tyrrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2021.1975590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Human Rights Act (HRA) has long been hailed for solving the historic tension between judicial oversight of rights protection and democratic legitimacy through the ‘elegant’ and ‘ingenious schem...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"466 - 496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1975590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1975590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,《人权法案》(Human Rights Act,简称HRA)一直被称赞为通过“优雅”和“巧妙”的方案解决了司法监督维权与民主合法性之间的历史紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discretionary Space and Declarations of Incompatibility
The Human Rights Act (HRA) has long been hailed for solving the historic tension between judicial oversight of rights protection and democratic legitimacy through the ‘elegant’ and ‘ingenious schem...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信