撤回的期刊文章和改变饮食行为的新研究机会

B. Wansink
{"title":"撤回的期刊文章和改变饮食行为的新研究机会","authors":"B. Wansink","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3716474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017-19, about 18 of my research articles were retracted. These retractions offer some useful lessons to scholars, and they also offer some useful next steps to those who want to publish in the social sciences. Two of these steps include 1) Choose a publishable topic, and 2) have a rough mental roadmap of what the finished paper might look. That is, what’s the positioning, the study, and the possible contribution.<br><br>The topics I’ve described here offer one set of roadmaps that could be useful. First, they were of interest to journals in medicine, behavioral economics, marketing, nutrition, psychology, health, and consumer behavior. Second, they each show what a finished paper might look like. They show the positioning, relevant background research, methodological tips, and key implications.<br><br>I find all of these topics super interesting and of practical importance. This document provides a two-page template for each one that shows 1) An overview why it was done, 2) the abstract (or a summary if there was no abstract), 3) the reason it was retracted, 4) how it could be done differently, and 5) promising new research opportunities on the topic.<br><br>Table 1 and Appendix D lay out an estimate of how much effort it might take to do studies on these topics, and Appendix B lays out other issues related to how these specific papers were investigated. I’ve also estimated what I think the practical impact each research project might have. These are my own subjective estimates, but you might find them a useful starting point if you’re looking for a tie-breaker between two different topics.<br><br>I would strongly encourage anyone who’s interested in publishing in these areas to closely follow the principles of open science. You can start by preregistering hypotheses and planned analyses, and following the other steps along the road to publication. Making specific hypotheses and testing them followed by open science principles will be the best next way forward on these topics.<br><br>Academia can be a tremendously rewarding career both you and for the people who benefit from you research. Best wishes in moving topics like these forward, and best wishes on a great career.","PeriodicalId":11036,"journal":{"name":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retracted Journal Articles and New Research Opportunities to Change Eating Behavior\",\"authors\":\"B. Wansink\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3716474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2017-19, about 18 of my research articles were retracted. These retractions offer some useful lessons to scholars, and they also offer some useful next steps to those who want to publish in the social sciences. Two of these steps include 1) Choose a publishable topic, and 2) have a rough mental roadmap of what the finished paper might look. That is, what’s the positioning, the study, and the possible contribution.<br><br>The topics I’ve described here offer one set of roadmaps that could be useful. First, they were of interest to journals in medicine, behavioral economics, marketing, nutrition, psychology, health, and consumer behavior. Second, they each show what a finished paper might look like. They show the positioning, relevant background research, methodological tips, and key implications.<br><br>I find all of these topics super interesting and of practical importance. This document provides a two-page template for each one that shows 1) An overview why it was done, 2) the abstract (or a summary if there was no abstract), 3) the reason it was retracted, 4) how it could be done differently, and 5) promising new research opportunities on the topic.<br><br>Table 1 and Appendix D lay out an estimate of how much effort it might take to do studies on these topics, and Appendix B lays out other issues related to how these specific papers were investigated. I’ve also estimated what I think the practical impact each research project might have. These are my own subjective estimates, but you might find them a useful starting point if you’re looking for a tie-breaker between two different topics.<br><br>I would strongly encourage anyone who’s interested in publishing in these areas to closely follow the principles of open science. You can start by preregistering hypotheses and planned analyses, and following the other steps along the road to publication. Making specific hypotheses and testing them followed by open science principles will be the best next way forward on these topics.<br><br>Academia can be a tremendously rewarding career both you and for the people who benefit from you research. Best wishes in moving topics like these forward, and best wishes on a great career.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3716474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3716474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2017-19年,我大约有18篇研究论文被撤回。这些撤稿事件为学者们提供了一些有用的教训,也为那些想要在社会科学领域发表论文的人提供了一些有用的后续步骤。其中两个步骤包括:1)选择一个可发表的主题;2)在脑海中勾画出最终论文的大致蓝图。也就是说,定位,研究和可能的贡献是什么。我在这里描述的主题提供了一组可能有用的路线图。首先,他们对医学、行为经济学、市场营销、营养学、心理学、健康和消费者行为等期刊感兴趣。其次,他们每个人都展示了一篇完成的论文可能是什么样子。它们展示了定位、相关的背景研究、方法提示和关键含义。我发现所有这些话题都非常有趣,而且具有实际意义。这份文件为每一篇文章提供了一个两页的模板,其中显示了1)概述为什么要这样做,2)摘要(如果没有摘要,则是摘要),3)撤回的原因,4)如何以不同的方式完成,以及5)在该主题上有希望的新研究机会。表1和附录D列出了对这些主题进行研究可能需要多少努力的估计,附录B列出了与如何调查这些特定论文相关的其他问题。我还估计了我认为每个研究项目可能产生的实际影响。这些都是我自己的主观估计,但如果你正在寻找两个不同主题之间的平衡点,你可能会发现它们是一个有用的起点。我强烈鼓励任何对这些领域的出版感兴趣的人密切遵循开放科学的原则。您可以从预先注册假设和计划分析开始,并遵循发布之路的其他步骤。提出具体的假设,并遵循开放科学原则对其进行测试,将是解决这些问题的最佳途径。学术界对你和从你的研究中受益的人来说都是一个非常有益的职业。祝愿这些话题顺利进行,并祝你事业有成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retracted Journal Articles and New Research Opportunities to Change Eating Behavior
In 2017-19, about 18 of my research articles were retracted. These retractions offer some useful lessons to scholars, and they also offer some useful next steps to those who want to publish in the social sciences. Two of these steps include 1) Choose a publishable topic, and 2) have a rough mental roadmap of what the finished paper might look. That is, what’s the positioning, the study, and the possible contribution.

The topics I’ve described here offer one set of roadmaps that could be useful. First, they were of interest to journals in medicine, behavioral economics, marketing, nutrition, psychology, health, and consumer behavior. Second, they each show what a finished paper might look like. They show the positioning, relevant background research, methodological tips, and key implications.

I find all of these topics super interesting and of practical importance. This document provides a two-page template for each one that shows 1) An overview why it was done, 2) the abstract (or a summary if there was no abstract), 3) the reason it was retracted, 4) how it could be done differently, and 5) promising new research opportunities on the topic.

Table 1 and Appendix D lay out an estimate of how much effort it might take to do studies on these topics, and Appendix B lays out other issues related to how these specific papers were investigated. I’ve also estimated what I think the practical impact each research project might have. These are my own subjective estimates, but you might find them a useful starting point if you’re looking for a tie-breaker between two different topics.

I would strongly encourage anyone who’s interested in publishing in these areas to closely follow the principles of open science. You can start by preregistering hypotheses and planned analyses, and following the other steps along the road to publication. Making specific hypotheses and testing them followed by open science principles will be the best next way forward on these topics.

Academia can be a tremendously rewarding career both you and for the people who benefit from you research. Best wishes in moving topics like these forward, and best wishes on a great career.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信