三维CAD系统导出三单元固定义齿计算机辅助设计的准确性和真确性

Ezzat Abou-AlNaga, Ashraf Hussein, Ahmed Naguib, S. Nossair
{"title":"三维CAD系统导出三单元固定义齿计算机辅助设计的准确性和真确性","authors":"Ezzat Abou-AlNaga, Ashraf Hussein, Ahmed Naguib, S. Nossair","doi":"10.54623/fdj.80112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Computer-aided design (CAD) software programs offer the option to export 3D scans and designs across different CADCAM systems, commonly referred to as open CADCAM technology. However, there is insufficient evidence of whether this exporting procedure has an impact on the accuracy of digital designs. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of 3 Intra oral scanners and the accuracy of 3 computer-aided design (CAD) softwares for a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis. Materials and Methods:Three CAD softwares (inLab 17™, CeraMill Mind™, Dental System 2017™) were used to generate designs of a three-unit fixed partial denture. The designs generated by each CAD software were exported as stl files to the other two CAD softwares. The exported designs were superimposed on the proprietary designs to evaluate the trueness of the exported designs. Results: The 3D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness with Cerec inLab, followed by Dental System and then Ceramill Mind. The 2D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness values with Dental System, Cerec inLab, then Ceramill Mind. There was however no statistically significant differences between the trueness of exported designs of the three CAD softwares. Conclusions: Exporting Computer aided designs of 3 unit FPD as stl files, designed using Cerec inLab, Dental System and Ceramill Mind did not effect its accuracy. There was no statistical significant difference between the host designs and the exported designs on the three investigated CAD softwares","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Trueness of exporting computer aided design of 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis by 3 CAD systems\",\"authors\":\"Ezzat Abou-AlNaga, Ashraf Hussein, Ahmed Naguib, S. Nossair\",\"doi\":\"10.54623/fdj.80112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Computer-aided design (CAD) software programs offer the option to export 3D scans and designs across different CADCAM systems, commonly referred to as open CADCAM technology. However, there is insufficient evidence of whether this exporting procedure has an impact on the accuracy of digital designs. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of 3 Intra oral scanners and the accuracy of 3 computer-aided design (CAD) softwares for a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis. Materials and Methods:Three CAD softwares (inLab 17™, CeraMill Mind™, Dental System 2017™) were used to generate designs of a three-unit fixed partial denture. The designs generated by each CAD software were exported as stl files to the other two CAD softwares. The exported designs were superimposed on the proprietary designs to evaluate the trueness of the exported designs. Results: The 3D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness with Cerec inLab, followed by Dental System and then Ceramill Mind. The 2D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness values with Dental System, Cerec inLab, then Ceramill Mind. There was however no statistically significant differences between the trueness of exported designs of the three CAD softwares. Conclusions: Exporting Computer aided designs of 3 unit FPD as stl files, designed using Cerec inLab, Dental System and Ceramill Mind did not effect its accuracy. There was no statistical significant difference between the host designs and the exported designs on the three investigated CAD softwares\",\"PeriodicalId\":100562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.80112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.80112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件程序提供跨不同CADCAM系统导出3D扫描和设计的选项,通常被称为开放式CADCAM技术。然而,没有足够的证据表明这种输出程序是否对数字设计的准确性有影响。目的:探讨3种口腔内扫描仪和3种计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件在三单元固定义齿修复中的准确性。材料和方法:使用三个CAD软件(inLab 17™,CeraMill Mind™,Dental System 2017™)生成三单元固定局部义齿的设计。每个CAD软件生成的设计以stl文件的形式导出到另外两个CAD软件。将输出设计与专利设计进行叠加,以评价输出设计的真实性。结果:对导出的设计进行三维分析,Cerec inLab的准确性最高,其次是Dental System,其次是Ceramill Mind。对输出的设计进行二维分析,发现使用Dental System, Cerec inLab,然后是Ceramill Mind的设计具有最佳的真实值。然而,三种CAD软件输出设计的真实性之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:将使用Cerec inLab、Dental System和Ceramill Mind设计的3单元FPD计算机辅助设计导出为stl文件不影响其准确性。在三种被调查的CAD软件上,主机设计与输出设计之间没有统计学上的显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and Trueness of exporting computer aided design of 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis by 3 CAD systems
Background: Computer-aided design (CAD) software programs offer the option to export 3D scans and designs across different CADCAM systems, commonly referred to as open CADCAM technology. However, there is insufficient evidence of whether this exporting procedure has an impact on the accuracy of digital designs. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of 3 Intra oral scanners and the accuracy of 3 computer-aided design (CAD) softwares for a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis. Materials and Methods:Three CAD softwares (inLab 17™, CeraMill Mind™, Dental System 2017™) were used to generate designs of a three-unit fixed partial denture. The designs generated by each CAD software were exported as stl files to the other two CAD softwares. The exported designs were superimposed on the proprietary designs to evaluate the trueness of the exported designs. Results: The 3D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness with Cerec inLab, followed by Dental System and then Ceramill Mind. The 2D analysis of the exported designs, revealed best trueness values with Dental System, Cerec inLab, then Ceramill Mind. There was however no statistically significant differences between the trueness of exported designs of the three CAD softwares. Conclusions: Exporting Computer aided designs of 3 unit FPD as stl files, designed using Cerec inLab, Dental System and Ceramill Mind did not effect its accuracy. There was no statistical significant difference between the host designs and the exported designs on the three investigated CAD softwares
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信