麻黄素的有效性,相比20µg / KgBB 30毫克的利多卡因注射异丙酚造成的疼痛和血流动力学反应一般petrozavodsk和插管ENDOTRAKEA

Dody Firmanda
{"title":"麻黄素的有效性,相比20µg / KgBB 30毫克的利多卡因注射异丙酚造成的疼痛和血流动力学反应一般petrozavodsk和插管ENDOTRAKEA","authors":"Dody Firmanda","doi":"10.36656/jpfh.v2i1.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose: To determine the effectiveness of pain reduction and hemodynamic response using a 30 mg lidocaine and 20 μg/kg of BB in the thirty seconds before propofol induction in general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Methods: This study has a double-blind clinical test design. A total of 140 ASA-1 and ASA-2 patients who would undergo surgery with general anesthesia techniques used propofol induction and were taken by Endotraskea to obtain one of the two groups. Thirty seconds before propofol induction, the group I is by adding lidocaine 30 mg, while the group II is by adding the ephedrine 20μg/KgMW thirty seconds before propofol induction. Assess the value of VAS at the time of injection of the first three cc propofol with an injection speed of 15-18 seconds. Systolic, diastolic blood pressure, MAP, and heart rate are recorded before premedication (baseline), after premedication, after administration of ephedrine, after induction of propofol and the 1st minute, 3.5 after intubation. Statistical tests conducted with Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, and Independent T-Test tests. Result: The comparison of the pain incidence rate between the two groups is the same as the value of VAS 0-3 in both groups. Indicate a meaningful difference in the ephedrine group 20 μg/KgMW obtained a median value of visual analog scale 0, 64.3% while VAS 1-3 as much as 35.7% in group Lidocaine 30 mg obtained by the median value of visual analog scale 0, 47.1% While at VAS 1-3 as much as 52.9%. The average arterial pressure of the ephedrine group is 30 seconds after the injection of propofol, 83 (73-91) mmHg, which is significantly higher when compared with the average arterial pressure of the group Lidocaine 30 mg, 74 (68-85) mmHg. Arterial pressure at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation in the ephedrine group consistently demonstrated a significantly higher value than the arterial pressure of the lidocaine group. Conclusion: Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW and 30 mg lidocaine are equally effective in terms of pain reduction due to propofol induction. Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW provides a lesser effect of hemodynamic changes in the injection of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.","PeriodicalId":17717,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi & Herbal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFEKTIFITAS EPHEDRINE 20 µg/KgBB DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN LIDOKAIN 30 mg TERHADAP NYERI DAN RESPON HEMODINAMIK AKIBAT PENYUNTIKAN PROPOFOL PADA ANESTESIA UMUM DENGAN INTUBASI ENDOTRAKEA\",\"authors\":\"Dody Firmanda\",\"doi\":\"10.36656/jpfh.v2i1.206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose: To determine the effectiveness of pain reduction and hemodynamic response using a 30 mg lidocaine and 20 μg/kg of BB in the thirty seconds before propofol induction in general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Methods: This study has a double-blind clinical test design. A total of 140 ASA-1 and ASA-2 patients who would undergo surgery with general anesthesia techniques used propofol induction and were taken by Endotraskea to obtain one of the two groups. Thirty seconds before propofol induction, the group I is by adding lidocaine 30 mg, while the group II is by adding the ephedrine 20μg/KgMW thirty seconds before propofol induction. Assess the value of VAS at the time of injection of the first three cc propofol with an injection speed of 15-18 seconds. Systolic, diastolic blood pressure, MAP, and heart rate are recorded before premedication (baseline), after premedication, after administration of ephedrine, after induction of propofol and the 1st minute, 3.5 after intubation. Statistical tests conducted with Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, and Independent T-Test tests. Result: The comparison of the pain incidence rate between the two groups is the same as the value of VAS 0-3 in both groups. Indicate a meaningful difference in the ephedrine group 20 μg/KgMW obtained a median value of visual analog scale 0, 64.3% while VAS 1-3 as much as 35.7% in group Lidocaine 30 mg obtained by the median value of visual analog scale 0, 47.1% While at VAS 1-3 as much as 52.9%. The average arterial pressure of the ephedrine group is 30 seconds after the injection of propofol, 83 (73-91) mmHg, which is significantly higher when compared with the average arterial pressure of the group Lidocaine 30 mg, 74 (68-85) mmHg. Arterial pressure at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation in the ephedrine group consistently demonstrated a significantly higher value than the arterial pressure of the lidocaine group. Conclusion: Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW and 30 mg lidocaine are equally effective in terms of pain reduction due to propofol induction. Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW provides a lesser effect of hemodynamic changes in the injection of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi & Herbal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi & Herbal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36656/jpfh.v2i1.206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Farmasi & Herbal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36656/jpfh.v2i1.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:观察异丙酚气管插管全麻诱导前30秒,利多卡因30 mg加BB 20 μg/kg对镇痛及血流动力学反应的影响。方法:采用双盲临床试验设计。共有140例ASA-1和ASA-2患者将采用全身麻醉技术进行手术,使用异丙酚诱导,并服用Endotraskea以获得两组中的一组。在异丙酚诱导前30秒,I组加利多卡因30 mg, II组在异丙酚诱导前30秒加麻黄碱20μg/KgMW。以15-18秒的注射速度,第一次注射3cc异丙酚时评估VAS的价值。记录给药前(基线)、给药后、给麻黄碱后、异丙酚诱导后、插管后1分钟、3.5分钟收缩压、舒张压、MAP、心率。统计检验采用卡方检验、曼-惠特尼检验和独立t检验。结果:两组疼痛发生率比较与两组VAS 0-3评分相同。麻黄碱组20 μg/KgMW获得的视觉模拟量表中位数为0.64.3%,而VAS 1-3组达到35.7%,利多卡因组30 mg获得的视觉模拟量表中位数为0.47.1%,而VAS 1-3组达到52.9%。注射异丙酚后30秒,麻黄碱组平均动脉压83 (73-91)mmHg,明显高于利多卡因30 mg组平均动脉压74 (68-85)mmHg。麻黄碱组插管后1、3、5 min动脉压均明显高于利多卡因组。结论:麻黄碱20 μg/KgMW与利多卡因30 mg对异丙酚诱导的镇痛效果相同。麻黄碱20 μg/KgMW在气管插管全麻注射时对血流动力学的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFEKTIFITAS EPHEDRINE 20 µg/KgBB DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN LIDOKAIN 30 mg TERHADAP NYERI DAN RESPON HEMODINAMIK AKIBAT PENYUNTIKAN PROPOFOL PADA ANESTESIA UMUM DENGAN INTUBASI ENDOTRAKEA
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of pain reduction and hemodynamic response using a 30 mg lidocaine and 20 μg/kg of BB in the thirty seconds before propofol induction in general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Methods: This study has a double-blind clinical test design. A total of 140 ASA-1 and ASA-2 patients who would undergo surgery with general anesthesia techniques used propofol induction and were taken by Endotraskea to obtain one of the two groups. Thirty seconds before propofol induction, the group I is by adding lidocaine 30 mg, while the group II is by adding the ephedrine 20μg/KgMW thirty seconds before propofol induction. Assess the value of VAS at the time of injection of the first three cc propofol with an injection speed of 15-18 seconds. Systolic, diastolic blood pressure, MAP, and heart rate are recorded before premedication (baseline), after premedication, after administration of ephedrine, after induction of propofol and the 1st minute, 3.5 after intubation. Statistical tests conducted with Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, and Independent T-Test tests. Result: The comparison of the pain incidence rate between the two groups is the same as the value of VAS 0-3 in both groups. Indicate a meaningful difference in the ephedrine group 20 μg/KgMW obtained a median value of visual analog scale 0, 64.3% while VAS 1-3 as much as 35.7% in group Lidocaine 30 mg obtained by the median value of visual analog scale 0, 47.1% While at VAS 1-3 as much as 52.9%. The average arterial pressure of the ephedrine group is 30 seconds after the injection of propofol, 83 (73-91) mmHg, which is significantly higher when compared with the average arterial pressure of the group Lidocaine 30 mg, 74 (68-85) mmHg. Arterial pressure at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation in the ephedrine group consistently demonstrated a significantly higher value than the arterial pressure of the lidocaine group. Conclusion: Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW and 30 mg lidocaine are equally effective in terms of pain reduction due to propofol induction. Ephedrine 20 μg/KgMW provides a lesser effect of hemodynamic changes in the injection of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信