南美地区主义国际政治经济学研究与概念牢笼

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ernesto Vivares, Lorena Herrera-Vinelli
{"title":"南美地区主义国际政治经济学研究与概念牢笼","authors":"Ernesto Vivares, Lorena Herrera-Vinelli","doi":"10.5216/sec.v23i.59744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the multiple, contrasting roles and limitations of the dominant IPE regionalist theories in the research about the New South American Regionalism. The article focuses on the methodological dimensions of each research approach, at the North and the South, analyzing the role of theory in research by the deployment of the Weberian concept of ‘iron cages.’ The paper critically examines two levels of categories in global conversations, one international and the other regional, which gathers dominantideas used in research on the IPE regionalism. The first level groups the South American perspectives from inside the region and anchored in dialogue with different international theoretical orientations. These are: the market-led perspective, the multilateral developmentalist, and the post developmental views. The secondlevel of categories includes the Eurocentric regionalism, liberal integration theory, and actor-oriented North American regional perspective.","PeriodicalId":38915,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade e Cultura","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research and conceptual cages in the International Political Economy of South American Regionalism\",\"authors\":\"Ernesto Vivares, Lorena Herrera-Vinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.5216/sec.v23i.59744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the multiple, contrasting roles and limitations of the dominant IPE regionalist theories in the research about the New South American Regionalism. The article focuses on the methodological dimensions of each research approach, at the North and the South, analyzing the role of theory in research by the deployment of the Weberian concept of ‘iron cages.’ The paper critically examines two levels of categories in global conversations, one international and the other regional, which gathers dominantideas used in research on the IPE regionalism. The first level groups the South American perspectives from inside the region and anchored in dialogue with different international theoretical orientations. These are: the market-led perspective, the multilateral developmentalist, and the post developmental views. The secondlevel of categories includes the Eurocentric regionalism, liberal integration theory, and actor-oriented North American regional perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociedade e Cultura\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociedade e Cultura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v23i.59744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade e Cultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v23i.59744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了国际政治经济学中心地区主义主流理论在新南美地区主义研究中的多重、对比作用及其局限性。本文着重于每种研究方法的方法论维度,在北方和南方,通过部署韦伯的“铁笼子”概念来分析理论在研究中的作用。本文批判性地考察了全球对话中的两个层面,一个是国际对话,另一个是区域对话,收集了国际政治经济学区域主义研究中使用的主导思想。第一层将南美地区内部的观点分组,并与不同的国际理论取向进行对话。这三种观点是:市场主导观点、多边发展主义观点和后发展主义观点。第二级分类包括以欧洲为中心的区域主义、自由一体化理论和行动者导向的北美区域观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research and conceptual cages in the International Political Economy of South American Regionalism
This article analyses the multiple, contrasting roles and limitations of the dominant IPE regionalist theories in the research about the New South American Regionalism. The article focuses on the methodological dimensions of each research approach, at the North and the South, analyzing the role of theory in research by the deployment of the Weberian concept of ‘iron cages.’ The paper critically examines two levels of categories in global conversations, one international and the other regional, which gathers dominantideas used in research on the IPE regionalism. The first level groups the South American perspectives from inside the region and anchored in dialogue with different international theoretical orientations. These are: the market-led perspective, the multilateral developmentalist, and the post developmental views. The secondlevel of categories includes the Eurocentric regionalism, liberal integration theory, and actor-oriented North American regional perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociedade e Cultura
Sociedade e Cultura Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信