Lte网络中传播路径损耗模型的比较分析

S. Siddiqui, Neda Fatima, Anwar Ahmad
{"title":"Lte网络中传播路径损耗模型的比较分析","authors":"S. Siddiqui, Neda Fatima, Anwar Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/ICPECA47973.2019.8975464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the radio propagation model that can be employed in case of 4th Generation (4G) cellular networks which is referred as long term evolution abbreviated as LTE. Since correctness of any propagation model depends on topography clutter and other constraints. An understanding of the large scale transmission effects is very imperative for blueprint of appropriate communication system. In this, various propagation models are studied and compared against measured data available in [1] for the dense urban region of Delhi NCR, India at 1800 MHz. In the investigation part; path loss values are observed over a distance of 2 Km at every 100 meter for all the models used. Analytical result shows that free space model has the minimum path loss in case of values of frequency values, antenna heights that are specified. Ericsson, Cost-231 along with ECC models have shown preferable outcomes in comparison toh the experimental data attained in the vicinity of NCR, Delhi (INDIA). Amongst all the models under analysis, Ericsson has shown the best result. These results have been obtained both on Matlab and Simulink. Both are coming equivalent. The best model as per the result is optimized to make it closer to the measured data.","PeriodicalId":6761,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Power Electronics, Control and Automation (ICPECA)","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis Of Propagation Path Loss Models In Lte Networks\",\"authors\":\"S. Siddiqui, Neda Fatima, Anwar Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPECA47973.2019.8975464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper analyzes the radio propagation model that can be employed in case of 4th Generation (4G) cellular networks which is referred as long term evolution abbreviated as LTE. Since correctness of any propagation model depends on topography clutter and other constraints. An understanding of the large scale transmission effects is very imperative for blueprint of appropriate communication system. In this, various propagation models are studied and compared against measured data available in [1] for the dense urban region of Delhi NCR, India at 1800 MHz. In the investigation part; path loss values are observed over a distance of 2 Km at every 100 meter for all the models used. Analytical result shows that free space model has the minimum path loss in case of values of frequency values, antenna heights that are specified. Ericsson, Cost-231 along with ECC models have shown preferable outcomes in comparison toh the experimental data attained in the vicinity of NCR, Delhi (INDIA). Amongst all the models under analysis, Ericsson has shown the best result. These results have been obtained both on Matlab and Simulink. Both are coming equivalent. The best model as per the result is optimized to make it closer to the measured data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Power Electronics, Control and Automation (ICPECA)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Power Electronics, Control and Automation (ICPECA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA47973.2019.8975464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Power Electronics, Control and Automation (ICPECA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPECA47973.2019.8975464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文分析了第4代(4G)蜂窝网络(称为长期演进,简称LTE)可采用的无线电传播模型。因为任何传播模型的正确性取决于地形杂波和其他约束条件。了解大规模传输效应对于设计合适的通信系统至关重要。本文研究了各种传播模型,并将其与[1]中可获得的印度德里NCR稠密城市地区1800 MHz的实测数据进行了比较。在调查部分;在所有使用的模式中,每隔100米观测距离为2公里的路径损失值。分析结果表明,在给定频率值和天线高度的情况下,自由空间模型具有最小的路径损耗。与在印度德里NCR附近获得的实验数据相比,Ericsson, Cost-231和ECC模型显示出更好的结果。在所有被分析的模型中,爱立信表现出了最好的结果。这些结果在Matlab和Simulink上都得到了验证。两者都是相同的。根据结果对最佳模型进行优化,使其更接近实测数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis Of Propagation Path Loss Models In Lte Networks
The paper analyzes the radio propagation model that can be employed in case of 4th Generation (4G) cellular networks which is referred as long term evolution abbreviated as LTE. Since correctness of any propagation model depends on topography clutter and other constraints. An understanding of the large scale transmission effects is very imperative for blueprint of appropriate communication system. In this, various propagation models are studied and compared against measured data available in [1] for the dense urban region of Delhi NCR, India at 1800 MHz. In the investigation part; path loss values are observed over a distance of 2 Km at every 100 meter for all the models used. Analytical result shows that free space model has the minimum path loss in case of values of frequency values, antenna heights that are specified. Ericsson, Cost-231 along with ECC models have shown preferable outcomes in comparison toh the experimental data attained in the vicinity of NCR, Delhi (INDIA). Amongst all the models under analysis, Ericsson has shown the best result. These results have been obtained both on Matlab and Simulink. Both are coming equivalent. The best model as per the result is optimized to make it closer to the measured data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信