框架来引出多维需求

Q4 Engineering

Ingenieria y Universidad Pub Date : 2018-08-09 DOI:10.11144/javeriana.iyu22-2.femr

E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.

{"title":"框架来引出多维需求","authors":"E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.iyu22-2.femr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Propose a framework to elicit multidimensional requirements. Materials and methods: A review of the literature is carried out, and the elicitation proposals are analyzed in which the multidimensionality of the requirements is taken into account. Results and discussion: 23 works were found, of which 15 were selected that met the quality conditions and inclusion criteria. These proposals are related to multidimensionality in elicitation but do not take it into account in order to construct a representative requirement specification. Conclusion: It is evident that there is no unanimity about the dimensions from which the requirements originate, and they have not been elicited. For this reason, and because its existence is accepted, it is necessary to unify criteria and propose frameworks to elicit multidimensional requirements.","PeriodicalId":39036,"journal":{"name":"Ingenieria y Universidad","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework to elicit multidimensional requirements\",\"authors\":\"E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.\",\"doi\":\"10.11144/javeriana.iyu22-2.femr\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Propose a framework to elicit multidimensional requirements. Materials and methods: A review of the literature is carried out, and the elicitation proposals are analyzed in which the multidimensionality of the requirements is taken into account. Results and discussion: 23 works were found, of which 15 were selected that met the quality conditions and inclusion criteria. These proposals are related to multidimensionality in elicitation but do not take it into account in order to construct a representative requirement specification. Conclusion: It is evident that there is no unanimity about the dimensions from which the requirements originate, and they have not been elicited. For this reason, and because its existence is accepted, it is necessary to unify criteria and propose frameworks to elicit multidimensional requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ingenieria y Universidad\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ingenieria y Universidad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.iyu22-2.femr\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenieria y Universidad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.iyu22-2.femr","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出一个框架来引出多维需求。材料和方法:对文献进行了回顾，并分析了考虑到需求的多维性的启发建议。结果与讨论:共发现23件作品，其中15件作品符合质量条件和纳入标准。这些建议与启发中的多维度有关，但是为了构建一个具有代表性的需求规范而没有考虑到多维度。结论:很明显，对于需求产生的维度并没有达成一致，它们也没有被引出来。由于这个原因，并且因为它的存在是被接受的，所以有必要统一标准并提出框架来引出多维需求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Framework to elicit multidimensional requirements

Objective: Propose a framework to elicit multidimensional requirements. Materials and methods: A review of the literature is carried out, and the elicitation proposals are analyzed in which the multidimensionality of the requirements is taken into account. Results and discussion: 23 works were found, of which 15 were selected that met the quality conditions and inclusion criteria. These proposals are related to multidimensionality in elicitation but do not take it into account in order to construct a representative requirement specification. Conclusion: It is evident that there is no unanimity about the dimensions from which the requirements originate, and they have not been elicited. For this reason, and because its existence is accepted, it is necessary to unify criteria and propose frameworks to elicit multidimensional requirements.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ingenieria y Universidad Engineering-Engineering (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Our journal''s main objective is to serve as a medium for the diffusion and divulgation of the articles and investigations in the engineering scientific and investigative fields. All the documents presented as result of an investigation will be received, as well as any review about engineering, this includes essays that might contribute to the academic and scientific discussion of any of the branches of engineering. Any contribution to the subject related to engineering development, ethics, values, or its relations with policies, culture, society and environmental fields are welcome. The publication frequency is semestral.