管理何时发展?外部联系、结构化实践与中国企业生产率

V. Karplus, T. Geissmann, Da Zhang
{"title":"管理何时发展?外部联系、结构化实践与中国企业生产率","authors":"V. Karplus, T. Geissmann, Da Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents evidence that structured management practices and their relationship to productivity can vary with a firm's external institutional linkages. Combining ideas from new institutionalism with the empirical management literature, we formulate propositions of how external linkages could affect the development and utility of structured management practices. We test these propositions in a representative sample of 390 manufacturing firms in China, where state linkages, proxied by controlling ownership, stabilize operating conditions for a subset of government-owned firms in the country's authoritarian capitalist system. Specifically, we find that measures of structured management practices increase with the strength of linkages to the state, with state-owned firms scoring higher than domestic private firms. We further show that, on average, a firm's overall management practice score is positively and significantly related to total factor productivity (TFP) in state-owned firms, but the correlation is no different from zero in both domestic and foreign private firms. We hypothesize that in China state linkages may lengthen decision horizons and enable firms to benefit from introducing management practices for both instrumental and symbolic reasons.","PeriodicalId":13677,"journal":{"name":"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Does Management Develop? External Linkages, Structured Practices, and Productivity in Chinese Firms\",\"authors\":\"V. Karplus, T. Geissmann, Da Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3459031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents evidence that structured management practices and their relationship to productivity can vary with a firm's external institutional linkages. Combining ideas from new institutionalism with the empirical management literature, we formulate propositions of how external linkages could affect the development and utility of structured management practices. We test these propositions in a representative sample of 390 manufacturing firms in China, where state linkages, proxied by controlling ownership, stabilize operating conditions for a subset of government-owned firms in the country's authoritarian capitalist system. Specifically, we find that measures of structured management practices increase with the strength of linkages to the state, with state-owned firms scoring higher than domestic private firms. We further show that, on average, a firm's overall management practice score is positively and significantly related to total factor productivity (TFP) in state-owned firms, but the correlation is no different from zero in both domestic and foreign private firms. We hypothesize that in China state linkages may lengthen decision horizons and enable firms to benefit from introducing management practices for both instrumental and symbolic reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提供的证据表明,结构化管理实践及其与生产率的关系可以随着公司的外部制度联系而变化。将新制度主义的思想与实证管理文献相结合,我们提出了外部联系如何影响结构化管理实践的发展和效用的命题。我们在中国390家制造企业的代表性样本中检验了这些命题,在中国的专制资本主义制度下,国家联系以控股所有权为代表,稳定了一部分国有企业的经营状况。具体而言,我们发现结构化管理实践的指标随着与国家联系的强度而增加,国有企业的得分高于国内民营企业。我们进一步表明,平均而言,企业的整体管理实践得分与国有企业的全要素生产率(TFP)呈正相关,但在国内和国外私营企业中,相关性都接近于零。我们假设,在中国,国家联系可能会延长决策视野,并使企业从引入管理实践中受益,这既有工具性的原因,也有象征性的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Does Management Develop? External Linkages, Structured Practices, and Productivity in Chinese Firms
This study presents evidence that structured management practices and their relationship to productivity can vary with a firm's external institutional linkages. Combining ideas from new institutionalism with the empirical management literature, we formulate propositions of how external linkages could affect the development and utility of structured management practices. We test these propositions in a representative sample of 390 manufacturing firms in China, where state linkages, proxied by controlling ownership, stabilize operating conditions for a subset of government-owned firms in the country's authoritarian capitalist system. Specifically, we find that measures of structured management practices increase with the strength of linkages to the state, with state-owned firms scoring higher than domestic private firms. We further show that, on average, a firm's overall management practice score is positively and significantly related to total factor productivity (TFP) in state-owned firms, but the correlation is no different from zero in both domestic and foreign private firms. We hypothesize that in China state linkages may lengthen decision horizons and enable firms to benefit from introducing management practices for both instrumental and symbolic reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信