低频膜吸收器的新研究

John Calder
{"title":"低频膜吸收器的新研究","authors":"John Calder","doi":"10.1121/2.0000816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorber effectiveness. Some unexpected results, however, showed clearly that without standardized laboratory absorption testing in a lab capable of accurately testing down to 40Hz, it is not possible to state conclusively that low-frequency absorber products perform as claimed.Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorb...","PeriodicalId":20469,"journal":{"name":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New research on low-frequency membrane absorbers\",\"authors\":\"John Calder\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/2.0000816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorber effectiveness. Some unexpected results, however, showed clearly that without standardized laboratory absorption testing in a lab capable of accurately testing down to 40Hz, it is not possible to state conclusively that low-frequency absorber products perform as claimed.Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorb...\",\"PeriodicalId\":20469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

低频(LF)房间模式是准确录音和再现的最大问题之一。有效的低频吸收器可以减轻专业和消费者音频室的模式。然而,基于纤维和泡沫的吸收器对声速起作用;膜吸收器作用于声压(在坚硬表面和角落最大)。在坚硬表面上的速度为零;因此,在200Hz下,纤维和泡沫吸收器的工作效率远远低于膜吸收器。此外,大多数独立的测试实验室只能精确测量160Hz以上(每施罗德频率)的吸收结果,而不能低于160Hz。只有一个实验室足够大,可以精确到40Hz。设计了一种新的低频膜吸收器产品,以补充现有产品的频率范围。在上述实验室分别测试了低至40Hz的低频吸收。10次低频吸波器试验表明,吸波器的类型及其在室内的位置和朝向对低频吸波器的效果至关重要。然而,一些意想不到的结果清楚地表明,在实验室中没有标准化的实验室吸收测试,能够准确地测试到40Hz,就不可能得出结论,低频吸收器产品的性能与所声称的一样。低频(LF)房间模式是准确录音和再现的最大问题之一。有效的低频吸收器可以减轻专业和消费者音频室的模式。然而,基于纤维和泡沫的吸收器对声速起作用;膜吸收器作用于声压(在坚硬表面和角落最大)。在坚硬表面上的速度为零;因此,在200Hz下,纤维和泡沫吸收器的工作效率远远低于膜吸收器。此外,大多数独立的测试实验室只能精确测量160Hz以上(每施罗德频率)的吸收结果,而不能低于160Hz。只有一个实验室足够大,可以精确到40Hz。设计了一种新的低频膜吸收器产品,以补充现有产品的频率范围。在上述实验室分别测试了低至40Hz的低频吸收。10次低低频吸波器试验表明,吸波器的类型及其在室内的位置和朝向对低低频吸波效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New research on low-frequency membrane absorbers
Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorber effectiveness. Some unexpected results, however, showed clearly that without standardized laboratory absorption testing in a lab capable of accurately testing down to 40Hz, it is not possible to state conclusively that low-frequency absorber products perform as claimed.Low-frequency (LF) room modes are one of the greatest issues for accurate sound recording and reproduction. Effective LF absorbers can mitigate modes in professional and consumer audio rooms. However, fiber- and foam-based absorbers act on sound velocity; membrane absorbers act on sound pressure (greatest at hard surfaces and corners). Velocity at hard surfaces is zero; thus, fiber and foam absorbers work far less effectively than membrane absorbers under 200Hz. Additionally, most independent testing laboratories are only large enough to accurately measure absorption results above 160Hz (per Schroeder frequency) but not below. Only one lab is large enough to be accurate down to 40Hz. A new LF membrane-based absorber product was designed to compliment the frequency range of an existing product. Both were separately tested for LF absorption down to 40Hz at the above-referenced lab. Ten LF absorber tests revealed that the type of absorber, and its location and orientation in a room, are critical to LF absorb...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信