Enaam Y. Abdel-Rahman, Sahar Y. Abdel-Aziz, Zainab El Sharkawy
{"title":"不同种植基台尺寸对两种整体陶瓷冠系统抗断裂性能的影响","authors":"Enaam Y. Abdel-Rahman, Sahar Y. Abdel-Aziz, Zainab El Sharkawy","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.74968.1360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to study the effect of different implant abutment sizes on fracture resistance of two ceramic monolithic crown systems. Material and Methods: Research Ethics committee approval of faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls was obtained (REC18-065). Forty (40) Titanium implant supported abutments were fabricated and divided into2 groups (n=20 each) according to abutment diameter; Group (1): implant abutment diameter 4mm and Group (2): implant supported abutment diameter 4.5mm. Samples of each group were divided into 2 sub-groups (n=10 each) according to type of monolithic ceramic crowns. Subgroup(A): zirconia ceramic crowns, Subgroup(B): vita suprinity crowns. All crowns were cemented to implant abutments by Rely X resin cement, then subjected to thermal cycling and seated on a universal testing machine and subjected to fracture resistance test. Data were statistically analyzed . Results: It was found that the highest mean ± SD values of fracture resistance were recorded for large diameter Zirconia subgroup (1032.2±174.78 N) followed by large diameter Vita suprinity subgroup mean ± SD values (935.7±83.71 N) then small diameter Zirconia subgroup (930.3±69.53 N), meanwhile the lowest mean ± SD values were recorded with small diameter Vita suprinity (815.9±101.52 N). Conclusion: The mean fracture values of zirconia were higher than that of vita suprinity crowns, while the crowns were supported on large implant abutment diameter had higher fracture resistance than that supported on smaller implant abutment diameter.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Different Implant Abutment Sizes on Fracture Resistance of Two Monolithic Ceramic Crown Systems\",\"authors\":\"Enaam Y. Abdel-Rahman, Sahar Y. Abdel-Aziz, Zainab El Sharkawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjg.2022.74968.1360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: to study the effect of different implant abutment sizes on fracture resistance of two ceramic monolithic crown systems. Material and Methods: Research Ethics committee approval of faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls was obtained (REC18-065). Forty (40) Titanium implant supported abutments were fabricated and divided into2 groups (n=20 each) according to abutment diameter; Group (1): implant abutment diameter 4mm and Group (2): implant supported abutment diameter 4.5mm. Samples of each group were divided into 2 sub-groups (n=10 each) according to type of monolithic ceramic crowns. Subgroup(A): zirconia ceramic crowns, Subgroup(B): vita suprinity crowns. All crowns were cemented to implant abutments by Rely X resin cement, then subjected to thermal cycling and seated on a universal testing machine and subjected to fracture resistance test. Data were statistically analyzed . Results: It was found that the highest mean ± SD values of fracture resistance were recorded for large diameter Zirconia subgroup (1032.2±174.78 N) followed by large diameter Vita suprinity subgroup mean ± SD values (935.7±83.71 N) then small diameter Zirconia subgroup (930.3±69.53 N), meanwhile the lowest mean ± SD values were recorded with small diameter Vita suprinity (815.9±101.52 N). Conclusion: The mean fracture values of zirconia were higher than that of vita suprinity crowns, while the crowns were supported on large implant abutment diameter had higher fracture resistance than that supported on smaller implant abutment diameter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.74968.1360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.74968.1360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究不同种植基台尺寸对两种陶瓷全冠系统抗断裂性能的影响。材料和方法:获得女口腔医学院伦理委员会批准(REC18-065)。制作钛种植体支撑基牙40个,根据基牙直径分为2组,每组20个;组(1):种植体基台直径4mm;组(2):种植体支撑基台直径4.5mm。每组样本按整体瓷冠类型分为2个亚组,每组n=10。亚组(A):氧化锆陶瓷冠;亚组(B): vita superity冠。所有冠用Rely X树脂水泥与种植基台粘合,热循环后置于万能试验机上进行抗断裂测试。对数据进行统计学分析。结果:大直径Zirconia亚组的骨折阻力平均值±SD值最高(1032.2±174.78 N),其次是大直径Vita超优亚组的平均值±SD值(935.7±83.71 N),其次是小直径Zirconia亚组的平均值±SD值(930.3±69.53 N),而小直径Vita超优亚组的平均值±SD值最低(815.9±101.52 N)。氧化锆牙冠的平均断裂值高于优质牙冠,而种植基牙直径大的牙冠比种植基牙直径小的牙冠具有更高的抗断裂能力。
The Influence of Different Implant Abutment Sizes on Fracture Resistance of Two Monolithic Ceramic Crown Systems
Purpose: to study the effect of different implant abutment sizes on fracture resistance of two ceramic monolithic crown systems. Material and Methods: Research Ethics committee approval of faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls was obtained (REC18-065). Forty (40) Titanium implant supported abutments were fabricated and divided into2 groups (n=20 each) according to abutment diameter; Group (1): implant abutment diameter 4mm and Group (2): implant supported abutment diameter 4.5mm. Samples of each group were divided into 2 sub-groups (n=10 each) according to type of monolithic ceramic crowns. Subgroup(A): zirconia ceramic crowns, Subgroup(B): vita suprinity crowns. All crowns were cemented to implant abutments by Rely X resin cement, then subjected to thermal cycling and seated on a universal testing machine and subjected to fracture resistance test. Data were statistically analyzed . Results: It was found that the highest mean ± SD values of fracture resistance were recorded for large diameter Zirconia subgroup (1032.2±174.78 N) followed by large diameter Vita suprinity subgroup mean ± SD values (935.7±83.71 N) then small diameter Zirconia subgroup (930.3±69.53 N), meanwhile the lowest mean ± SD values were recorded with small diameter Vita suprinity (815.9±101.52 N). Conclusion: The mean fracture values of zirconia were higher than that of vita suprinity crowns, while the crowns were supported on large implant abutment diameter had higher fracture resistance than that supported on smaller implant abutment diameter.