北爱尔兰

Kerry O'Halloran
{"title":"北爱尔兰","authors":"Kerry O'Halloran","doi":"10.1177/03085759231183644a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal note on this case is in two parts: part one, examining the facts and outlining the process, was considered in the last issue of Adoption & Fostering (O’Halloran, 2023); this part studies the court’s review of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law which, it felt, had not been taken into account by Judge Larkin. The case concerned an appeal by a Health and Social Care Trust against the decision of Judge Larkin to refuse an application by the Trust for an order freeing Joy, a 5-year-old child, for adoption pursuant to Article 18 of the Adoption (Northern Ireland) Order 1987. The court had already allowed the appeal and the freeing order had been made. The question of post-adoption contact was the only remaining issue in the present hearing. The court was assembled to provide reasons for reaching the decision it did and to reiterate some important points pertaining to good practice and procedure regarding freeing for adoption applications in this jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"41 1","pages":"233 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Northern Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Kerry O'Halloran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03085759231183644a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legal note on this case is in two parts: part one, examining the facts and outlining the process, was considered in the last issue of Adoption & Fostering (O’Halloran, 2023); this part studies the court’s review of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law which, it felt, had not been taken into account by Judge Larkin. The case concerned an appeal by a Health and Social Care Trust against the decision of Judge Larkin to refuse an application by the Trust for an order freeing Joy, a 5-year-old child, for adoption pursuant to Article 18 of the Adoption (Northern Ireland) Order 1987. The court had already allowed the appeal and the freeing order had been made. The question of post-adoption contact was the only remaining issue in the present hearing. The court was assembled to provide reasons for reaching the decision it did and to reiterate some important points pertaining to good practice and procedure regarding freeing for adoption applications in this jurisdiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & fostering\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & fostering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231183644a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759231183644a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于此案的法律说明分为两部分:第一部分,审查事实并概述过程,在上一期的《收养与养育》(O 'Halloran, 2023)中进行了考虑;这一部分研究法院对欧洲人权法院(欧洲人权法院)判例法的审查,认为拉金法官没有考虑到这些判例法。该案涉及卫生和社会保健信托基金对拉金法官的一项决定提出的上诉,该决定拒绝信托基金根据1987年《收养(北爱尔兰)令》第18条提出的释放5岁儿童Joy的命令,供其收养的申请。法院已经批准了上诉,并下达了释放令。收养后接触的问题是本次听证会上唯一剩下的问题。法院召开会议是为了说明作出这一决定的理由,并重申有关在本司法管辖区准许收养申请的良好做法和程序的一些要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Northern Ireland
The legal note on this case is in two parts: part one, examining the facts and outlining the process, was considered in the last issue of Adoption & Fostering (O’Halloran, 2023); this part studies the court’s review of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law which, it felt, had not been taken into account by Judge Larkin. The case concerned an appeal by a Health and Social Care Trust against the decision of Judge Larkin to refuse an application by the Trust for an order freeing Joy, a 5-year-old child, for adoption pursuant to Article 18 of the Adoption (Northern Ireland) Order 1987. The court had already allowed the appeal and the freeing order had been made. The question of post-adoption contact was the only remaining issue in the present hearing. The court was assembled to provide reasons for reaching the decision it did and to reiterate some important points pertaining to good practice and procedure regarding freeing for adoption applications in this jurisdiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信