质量行

D. Stevens
{"title":"质量行","authors":"D. Stevens","doi":"10.1136/qshc.2010.048298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Turning administrative data into real-time clinically useful information The delivery of clinical care in isolation of data and information is no longer prudent or acceptable. Cardiothoracic surgical programs face increasingly more complex procedures performed on evermore challenging patients. Public and private stakeholders are demanding these programs report process-level and clinical outcomes as a mechanism for enabling informed clinical decision-making. Increasingly these measures are tied to reimbursement and institutional accreditation. This report describes the development of a system for linking administrative and clinical registries, in real-time, to track performance to satisfy both the needs of patients and stakeholders. Institutional performance is displayed over time using process control charts, and compared to both internal and regional benchmarks. Quarterly reports are automated for five surgical cohorts and are displayed externally on a dedicated website, and internally in the cardiothoracic surgical office suites, operating theatre, and nursing units. Monthly discussions are held with the clinical staff. Expanded applications are serving to integrate these data further into clinical care to drive process improvement. (See page 399)","PeriodicalId":20849,"journal":{"name":"Quality and Safety in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality lines\",\"authors\":\"D. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/qshc.2010.048298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Turning administrative data into real-time clinically useful information The delivery of clinical care in isolation of data and information is no longer prudent or acceptable. Cardiothoracic surgical programs face increasingly more complex procedures performed on evermore challenging patients. Public and private stakeholders are demanding these programs report process-level and clinical outcomes as a mechanism for enabling informed clinical decision-making. Increasingly these measures are tied to reimbursement and institutional accreditation. This report describes the development of a system for linking administrative and clinical registries, in real-time, to track performance to satisfy both the needs of patients and stakeholders. Institutional performance is displayed over time using process control charts, and compared to both internal and regional benchmarks. Quarterly reports are automated for five surgical cohorts and are displayed externally on a dedicated website, and internally in the cardiothoracic surgical office suites, operating theatre, and nursing units. Monthly discussions are held with the clinical staff. Expanded applications are serving to integrate these data further into clinical care to drive process improvement. (See page 399)\",\"PeriodicalId\":20849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality and Safety in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality and Safety in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.048298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality and Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2010.048298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将管理数据转化为实时的临床有用信息孤立地提供临床护理不再是谨慎或可接受的做法。心胸外科项目面临着越来越复杂的程序,在越来越有挑战性的病人身上进行。公共和私人利益相关者要求这些项目报告过程水平和临床结果,作为一种促进知情临床决策的机制。这些措施越来越多地与报销和机构认证联系在一起。本报告描述了一个系统的开发,用于实时连接行政和临床登记,以跟踪绩效,以满足患者和利益相关者的需求。利用过程控制图表显示机构绩效,并与内部和区域基准进行比较。五个手术队列的季度报告是自动化的,并在一个专门的网站上对外显示,在心胸外科办公室套房、手术室和护理单位内部显示。每月与临床工作人员进行讨论。扩展的应用程序将这些数据进一步集成到临床护理中,以推动流程改进。(见399页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality lines
Turning administrative data into real-time clinically useful information The delivery of clinical care in isolation of data and information is no longer prudent or acceptable. Cardiothoracic surgical programs face increasingly more complex procedures performed on evermore challenging patients. Public and private stakeholders are demanding these programs report process-level and clinical outcomes as a mechanism for enabling informed clinical decision-making. Increasingly these measures are tied to reimbursement and institutional accreditation. This report describes the development of a system for linking administrative and clinical registries, in real-time, to track performance to satisfy both the needs of patients and stakeholders. Institutional performance is displayed over time using process control charts, and compared to both internal and regional benchmarks. Quarterly reports are automated for five surgical cohorts and are displayed externally on a dedicated website, and internally in the cardiothoracic surgical office suites, operating theatre, and nursing units. Monthly discussions are held with the clinical staff. Expanded applications are serving to integrate these data further into clinical care to drive process improvement. (See page 399)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信