血友病A型不同治疗策略的临床与经济分析

N. Bezditko, O. Stasyshyn
{"title":"血友病A型不同治疗策略的临床与经济分析","authors":"N. Bezditko, O. Stasyshyn","doi":"10.24959/cphj.17.1414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although hemophilia A is a rare disease, its treatment is costly, and expenses are mainly related to the cost of factor VIII concentrates. Aim. To evaluate the clinical and economic feasibility of rFVIIa (NovoSeven®) for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A compared to the schemes based on the use of APCC (Feiba). Matherials and methods. Clinical and economic analysis was conducted by the “total cost of illness” method using modeling by building a “decision tree”. This study identifies only the direct costs of pharmacotherapy. The cost of a vial of each of the concentrates analyzed meets the declared value as of December 2016. Results. The analytical model of the “decision tree” was designed to calculate the costs for the outpatient treatment of mild and moderate bleedings. Due to higher clinical efficacy the use of rFVIIa as the first-line therapy saves 32 % to 42 % in the treatment of a patient; in the conditions of the modern Ukrainian pharmaceutical market it is from UAH 170,326.4 to UAH 252,990.4 (with an adapted variant of therapy) and UAH 291,743.1 in the basic variant. When using rFVIIa as the first-line therapy the costs for life appeared to be lower by approximately 10 % than when taking APCC. Conclusions. The use of NovoSeven® is more feasible economically and allows both to improve outcomes and to spend financial resources more efficiently to treat these patients.","PeriodicalId":10498,"journal":{"name":"Clinical pharmacy","volume":"39 1","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and economic analysis of different strategies for the treatment of hemophilia A\",\"authors\":\"N. Bezditko, O. Stasyshyn\",\"doi\":\"10.24959/cphj.17.1414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although hemophilia A is a rare disease, its treatment is costly, and expenses are mainly related to the cost of factor VIII concentrates. Aim. To evaluate the clinical and economic feasibility of rFVIIa (NovoSeven®) for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A compared to the schemes based on the use of APCC (Feiba). Matherials and methods. Clinical and economic analysis was conducted by the “total cost of illness” method using modeling by building a “decision tree”. This study identifies only the direct costs of pharmacotherapy. The cost of a vial of each of the concentrates analyzed meets the declared value as of December 2016. Results. The analytical model of the “decision tree” was designed to calculate the costs for the outpatient treatment of mild and moderate bleedings. Due to higher clinical efficacy the use of rFVIIa as the first-line therapy saves 32 % to 42 % in the treatment of a patient; in the conditions of the modern Ukrainian pharmaceutical market it is from UAH 170,326.4 to UAH 252,990.4 (with an adapted variant of therapy) and UAH 291,743.1 in the basic variant. When using rFVIIa as the first-line therapy the costs for life appeared to be lower by approximately 10 % than when taking APCC. Conclusions. The use of NovoSeven® is more feasible economically and allows both to improve outcomes and to spend financial resources more efficiently to treat these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"10-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.17.1414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.17.1414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血友病A虽然是一种罕见病,但其治疗费用昂贵,费用主要与因子VIII浓缩物的费用有关。的目标。比较基于APCC (Feiba)的方案,评估rFVIIa (NovoSeven®)治疗A型血友病患者的临床和经济可行性。材料和方法。临床和经济分析采用“疾病总成本”方法,通过建立“决策树”模型进行建模。这项研究只确定了药物治疗的直接成本。每瓶分析浓缩液的成本符合2016年12月的申报价值。结果。设计“决策树”分析模型,计算轻中度出血门诊治疗费用。由于临床疗效较高,使用rFVIIa作为一线治疗可节省32%至42%的治疗费用;在现代乌克兰医药市场的条件下,价格从170,326.4乌里乌斯至252,990.4乌里乌斯(有一种改进型治疗)和291,743.1乌里乌斯(基本型)。当使用rFVIIa作为一线治疗时,生命成本似乎比使用APCC低约10%。结论。使用NovoSeven®在经济上更可行,既可以改善治疗效果,又可以更有效地使用财政资源来治疗这些患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and economic analysis of different strategies for the treatment of hemophilia A
Although hemophilia A is a rare disease, its treatment is costly, and expenses are mainly related to the cost of factor VIII concentrates. Aim. To evaluate the clinical and economic feasibility of rFVIIa (NovoSeven®) for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A compared to the schemes based on the use of APCC (Feiba). Matherials and methods. Clinical and economic analysis was conducted by the “total cost of illness” method using modeling by building a “decision tree”. This study identifies only the direct costs of pharmacotherapy. The cost of a vial of each of the concentrates analyzed meets the declared value as of December 2016. Results. The analytical model of the “decision tree” was designed to calculate the costs for the outpatient treatment of mild and moderate bleedings. Due to higher clinical efficacy the use of rFVIIa as the first-line therapy saves 32 % to 42 % in the treatment of a patient; in the conditions of the modern Ukrainian pharmaceutical market it is from UAH 170,326.4 to UAH 252,990.4 (with an adapted variant of therapy) and UAH 291,743.1 in the basic variant. When using rFVIIa as the first-line therapy the costs for life appeared to be lower by approximately 10 % than when taking APCC. Conclusions. The use of NovoSeven® is more feasible economically and allows both to improve outcomes and to spend financial resources more efficiently to treat these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信