P. Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, J. Schwanethal, Y. Buret
{"title":"技术说明:用4He∕3He激光微探针分析原位U-Th-He定年","authors":"P. Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, J. Schwanethal, Y. Buret","doi":"10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique\nthat combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass\nspectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass\nspectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital)\nthermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to\npersistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current\nin situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He\nmeasurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in\ncontrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar\nabundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by\nisotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so\neasy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration\nstandards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required\nmolar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is\nhigher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself\ndifficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this\nproblem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for\nablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known\nU–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using\nrelative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot\nexperiments show that the new method produces accurate results.\nHowever, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to\ngradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and\ntheir effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and\nthe standard during the proton irradiation.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis\",\"authors\":\"P. Vermeesch, Yuntao Tian, J. Schwanethal, Y. Buret\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique\\nthat combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass\\nspectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass\\nspectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital)\\nthermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to\\npersistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current\\nin situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He\\nmeasurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in\\ncontrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar\\nabundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by\\nisotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so\\neasy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration\\nstandards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required\\nmolar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is\\nhigher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself\\ndifficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this\\nproblem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for\\nablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known\\nU–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using\\nrelative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot\\nexperiments show that the new method produces accurate results.\\nHowever, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to\\ngradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and\\ntheir effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and\\nthe standard during the proton irradiation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-323-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Technical note: In situ U–Th–He dating by 4He ∕ 3He laser microprobe analysis
Abstract. In situ U–Th–He geochronology is a potentially disruptive technique
that combines laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) with laser microprobe noble gas mass
spectrometry. Despite its potential to revolutionize (detrital)
thermochronology, in situ U–Th–He dating is not widely used due to
persistent analytical challenges. A major issue is that current
in situ U–Th–He dating approaches require that the U, Th, and He
measurements are expressed in units of molar concentration, in
contrast with conventional methods, which use units of molar
abundance. Whereas molar abundances can be reliably determined by
isotope dilution, accurate concentration measurements are not so
easy to obtain. In the absence of matrix-matched U–Th concentration
standards and accurate He ablation pit measurements, the required
molar concentration calculations introduce an uncertainty that is
higher than the conventional method, an uncertainty that is itself
difficult to accurately quantify. We present a solution to this
problem by using proton-induced 3He as a proxy for
ablation pit volume and by pairing samples with a standard of known
U–Th–He age. Thus, the U–Th–He age equation can be solved using
relative rather than absolute concentration measurements. Pilot
experiments show that the new method produces accurate results.
However, it is prone to overdispersion, which is attributed to
gradients in the proton fluence. These gradients can be measured, and
their effect can be removed by fixing the geometry of the sample and
the standard during the proton irradiation.