中文的范围和相对度量

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Haoze Li
{"title":"中文的范围和相对度量","authors":"Haoze Li","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that the scope of quantifiers is not uniform: different quantifiers exhibit different scope properties. This paper examines the scope of a relatively understudied quantificational DP—relative measure phrases that contain proportional number expressions like 40%, one third, half, etc and relate one quantity to another. Based on relative measurement constructions in Mandarin, I observe that a relative measure phrase exhibits distinct scope patterns when it participates in the so-called ‘conservative’ and ‘non-conservative’ reading (terminology from Ahn & Sauerland (2017)). I pursue a decompositional analysis to account for the scopal difference: a relative measure phrase is decomposed into a degree quantifier denoted by the proportional number expression and a counting quantifier. A proportional number expression can take DP-internal scope or DP-external scope. Different scope taking strategies face different constraints, which in turn give rise to distinct scope possibilities.","PeriodicalId":46319,"journal":{"name":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scope and relative measurement in Mandarin\",\"authors\":\"Haoze Li\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/glossa.5787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that the scope of quantifiers is not uniform: different quantifiers exhibit different scope properties. This paper examines the scope of a relatively understudied quantificational DP—relative measure phrases that contain proportional number expressions like 40%, one third, half, etc and relate one quantity to another. Based on relative measurement constructions in Mandarin, I observe that a relative measure phrase exhibits distinct scope patterns when it participates in the so-called ‘conservative’ and ‘non-conservative’ reading (terminology from Ahn & Sauerland (2017)). I pursue a decompositional analysis to account for the scopal difference: a relative measure phrase is decomposed into a degree quantifier denoted by the proportional number expression and a counting quantifier. A proportional number expression can take DP-internal scope or DP-external scope. Different scope taking strategies face different constraints, which in turn give rise to distinct scope possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5787\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,量词的范围是不统一的,不同的量词表现出不同的范围性质。本文研究了一个相对未被充分研究的定量dp相对度量短语的范围,这些短语包含比例数字表达式,如40%,三分之一,一半等,并将一个量与另一个量联系起来。基于汉语中的相对测量结构,我观察到相对测量短语在参与所谓的“保守”和“非保守”阅读时表现出不同的范围模式(Ahn & Sauerland(2017)的术语)。我进行了分解分析,以解释范围差异:一个相对度量短语被分解为一个由比例数字表达式表示的程度量词和一个计数量词。比例数表达式可以是DP-internal scope或DP-external scope。不同的范围占有策略面临不同的约束条件,从而产生不同的范围占有可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scope and relative measurement in Mandarin
It is well known that the scope of quantifiers is not uniform: different quantifiers exhibit different scope properties. This paper examines the scope of a relatively understudied quantificational DP—relative measure phrases that contain proportional number expressions like 40%, one third, half, etc and relate one quantity to another. Based on relative measurement constructions in Mandarin, I observe that a relative measure phrase exhibits distinct scope patterns when it participates in the so-called ‘conservative’ and ‘non-conservative’ reading (terminology from Ahn & Sauerland (2017)). I pursue a decompositional analysis to account for the scopal difference: a relative measure phrase is decomposed into a degree quantifier denoted by the proportional number expression and a counting quantifier. A proportional number expression can take DP-internal scope or DP-external scope. Different scope taking strategies face different constraints, which in turn give rise to distinct scope possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
62 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信