基于神经网络集成的局部放电识别

A. Mas’ud, B. Stewart, S. McMeekin, A. Nesbitt
{"title":"基于神经网络集成的局部放电识别","authors":"A. Mas’ud, B. Stewart, S. McMeekin, A. Nesbitt","doi":"10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces an improved method for classifying Partial Discharge (PD) patterns using Ensemble Neural Network (ENN) learning. The method is based on training several Neural Network (NN) models and combining their predictions. In this paper it is applied to the recognition of PD from artificially created poly-ethylene-terephthalate (PET) voids and in particular the ability of the ENN to categorise statistical Φ-q-n patterns for two different void sizes over 50 and 250 power cycles. The training data for the ENN comprises statistical parameters obtained from voids of 0.6mm and 1mm diameter. Measurements were made on three separately manufactured void samples for both these diameters. Similarities between the different PD measurements and different cycle captures is investigated using both a Single Neural Network (SNN) and the ENN. For each set of 3 void samples, each NN was trained and tested from the data of one PD void defect. Each NN was then tested using data from two other void geometries in order to determine the recognition abilities of both the ENN and SNN. The results show that the ENN always produces higher recognition efficiency for unseen data when compared to the SNN. It is also shown that ENN produces similar recognition predictions for PD patterns captured using either 50 or 250 power cycles while the SNN shows more sensitivity to the number of power cycles captured.","PeriodicalId":6317,"journal":{"name":"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena","volume":"28 1","pages":"497-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition of partial discharges using an Ensemble of Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"A. Mas’ud, B. Stewart, S. McMeekin, A. Nesbitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces an improved method for classifying Partial Discharge (PD) patterns using Ensemble Neural Network (ENN) learning. The method is based on training several Neural Network (NN) models and combining their predictions. In this paper it is applied to the recognition of PD from artificially created poly-ethylene-terephthalate (PET) voids and in particular the ability of the ENN to categorise statistical Φ-q-n patterns for two different void sizes over 50 and 250 power cycles. The training data for the ENN comprises statistical parameters obtained from voids of 0.6mm and 1mm diameter. Measurements were made on three separately manufactured void samples for both these diameters. Similarities between the different PD measurements and different cycle captures is investigated using both a Single Neural Network (SNN) and the ENN. For each set of 3 void samples, each NN was trained and tested from the data of one PD void defect. Each NN was then tested using data from two other void geometries in order to determine the recognition abilities of both the ENN and SNN. The results show that the ENN always produces higher recognition efficiency for unseen data when compared to the SNN. It is also shown that ENN produces similar recognition predictions for PD patterns captured using either 50 or 250 power cycles while the SNN shows more sensitivity to the number of power cycles captured.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"497-500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

介绍了一种基于集成神经网络学习的局部放电模式分类改进方法。该方法是基于训练多个神经网络(NN)模型并结合它们的预测。在本文中,它被应用于从人工创建的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)空隙中识别PD,特别是新能源网络在50和250功率循环中对两种不同空隙尺寸的统计Φ-q-n模式进行分类的能力。ENN的训练数据包括从0.6mm和1mm直径的孔洞中获得的统计参数。对这两种直径的三个单独制造的空隙样品进行了测量。使用单个神经网络(SNN)和ENN研究了不同PD测量和不同周期捕获之间的相似性。对于每组3个空洞样本,每个神经网络从一个PD空洞缺陷的数据进行训练和测试。然后使用来自其他两个空洞几何的数据对每个神经网络进行测试,以确定ENN和SNN的识别能力。结果表明,与信噪比网络相比,新神经网络对未知数据的识别效率更高。研究还表明,新神经网络对使用50或250个功率周期捕获的PD模式产生类似的识别预测,而SNN对捕获的功率周期数量更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognition of partial discharges using an Ensemble of Neural Networks
This paper introduces an improved method for classifying Partial Discharge (PD) patterns using Ensemble Neural Network (ENN) learning. The method is based on training several Neural Network (NN) models and combining their predictions. In this paper it is applied to the recognition of PD from artificially created poly-ethylene-terephthalate (PET) voids and in particular the ability of the ENN to categorise statistical Φ-q-n patterns for two different void sizes over 50 and 250 power cycles. The training data for the ENN comprises statistical parameters obtained from voids of 0.6mm and 1mm diameter. Measurements were made on three separately manufactured void samples for both these diameters. Similarities between the different PD measurements and different cycle captures is investigated using both a Single Neural Network (SNN) and the ENN. For each set of 3 void samples, each NN was trained and tested from the data of one PD void defect. Each NN was then tested using data from two other void geometries in order to determine the recognition abilities of both the ENN and SNN. The results show that the ENN always produces higher recognition efficiency for unseen data when compared to the SNN. It is also shown that ENN produces similar recognition predictions for PD patterns captured using either 50 or 250 power cycles while the SNN shows more sensitivity to the number of power cycles captured.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信