结论:在政治科学对公平的持久追求中,最近的步骤和前进的道路

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Carol Mershon
{"title":"结论:在政治科学对公平的持久追求中,最近的步骤和前进的道路","authors":"Carol Mershon","doi":"10.1017/S1049096522000890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As emphasized in this symposium, political scientists have long decried systemic inequality and inequity in the profession. Despite an abundant literature addressing these profound problems, they persist.What can bring genuine change to the discipline? This symposium offers a fresh perspective on the stubborn barriers to creating a positive climate for women, scholars of color, LGBTQþ identified, and other underrepresented individuals in political science. We analyze microaggression, bullying, and implicit bias (Ghosh and Wang 2022) as well as exclusion and disproportionate service burdens (Simien and Wallace 2022). Stressing that past attempts to surmount the obstacles have not resolved them, we discuss what can overcome the problems. We identify best practices at both the departmental and university levels (Michelson and Wilkinson 2022). Furthermore, we recommend policies, initiatives, and strategies that the American Political Science Association (APSA) can pursue (Ackerly and Franklin 2022). In this conclusion to the symposium, however, I do not recapitulate the introduction or the articles that comprise its main narrative. Rather, I track recent progress and discuss how we can effect structural transformation to better combat systemic inequity and inequality in political science.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion: Recent Steps and the Road Ahead in the Enduring Quest for Equity in Political Science\",\"authors\":\"Carol Mershon\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1049096522000890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As emphasized in this symposium, political scientists have long decried systemic inequality and inequity in the profession. Despite an abundant literature addressing these profound problems, they persist.What can bring genuine change to the discipline? This symposium offers a fresh perspective on the stubborn barriers to creating a positive climate for women, scholars of color, LGBTQþ identified, and other underrepresented individuals in political science. We analyze microaggression, bullying, and implicit bias (Ghosh and Wang 2022) as well as exclusion and disproportionate service burdens (Simien and Wallace 2022). Stressing that past attempts to surmount the obstacles have not resolved them, we discuss what can overcome the problems. We identify best practices at both the departmental and university levels (Michelson and Wilkinson 2022). Furthermore, we recommend policies, initiatives, and strategies that the American Political Science Association (APSA) can pursue (Ackerly and Franklin 2022). In this conclusion to the symposium, however, I do not recapitulate the introduction or the articles that comprise its main narrative. Rather, I track recent progress and discuss how we can effect structural transformation to better combat systemic inequity and inequality in political science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

正如本次研讨会所强调的那样,政治学家长期以来一直谴责政治学界的系统性不平等和不公平。尽管有大量的文献解决这些深刻的问题,但它们仍然存在。什么能给这门学科带来真正的改变?本次研讨会提供了一个新的视角,为女性、有色人种学者、LGBTQþ学者和其他在政治科学中未被充分代表的个人创造积极氛围的顽固障碍。我们分析了微攻击、欺凌和内隐偏见(Ghosh and Wang 2022)以及排斥和不成比例的服务负担(Simien and Wallace 2022)。我们强调过去克服障碍的努力并没有解决这些障碍,因此讨论可以克服这些问题的办法。我们确定了部门和大学层面的最佳实践(Michelson和Wilkinson 2022)。此外,我们还建议美国政治科学协会(APSA)可以推行的政策、举措和战略(Ackerly and Franklin 2022)。然而,在这次专题讨论会的结论中,我不重述构成其主要叙述的导言或文章。相反,我追踪了最近的进展,并讨论了我们如何实现结构转型,以更好地打击政治科学中的系统性不平等和不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion: Recent Steps and the Road Ahead in the Enduring Quest for Equity in Political Science
As emphasized in this symposium, political scientists have long decried systemic inequality and inequity in the profession. Despite an abundant literature addressing these profound problems, they persist.What can bring genuine change to the discipline? This symposium offers a fresh perspective on the stubborn barriers to creating a positive climate for women, scholars of color, LGBTQþ identified, and other underrepresented individuals in political science. We analyze microaggression, bullying, and implicit bias (Ghosh and Wang 2022) as well as exclusion and disproportionate service burdens (Simien and Wallace 2022). Stressing that past attempts to surmount the obstacles have not resolved them, we discuss what can overcome the problems. We identify best practices at both the departmental and university levels (Michelson and Wilkinson 2022). Furthermore, we recommend policies, initiatives, and strategies that the American Political Science Association (APSA) can pursue (Ackerly and Franklin 2022). In this conclusion to the symposium, however, I do not recapitulate the introduction or the articles that comprise its main narrative. Rather, I track recent progress and discuss how we can effect structural transformation to better combat systemic inequity and inequality in political science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ps-Political Science & Politics
Ps-Political Science & Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: PS: Political Science & Politics provides critical analyses of contemporary political phenomena and is the journal of record for the discipline of political science reporting on research, teaching, and professional development. PS, begun in 1968, is the only quarterly professional news and commentary journal in the field and is the prime source of information on political scientists" achievements and professional concerns. PS: Political Science & Politics is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with American Political Science Review and Perspectives on Politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信