多元社会中的教育统一

H. Broudy
{"title":"多元社会中的教育统一","authors":"H. Broudy","doi":"10.1086/443389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can we formulate a unifying principle for the public school in a fragmented, pluralistic society? I shall argue that we can. This answer is radical in both the loose and strict sense of the word. In the loose sense it is so unfashionable-at least with respect to the literature in professional education-as to be shocking. But an affirmative answer is also radical in that it goes to the root of the matter, namely, the continued existence of an American public school. In an age when educational questions and answers are shrouded in clouds of administrative complexity and bureaucratic sophistication, perhaps most astonishing is the simplicity, almost simplemindedness, of the formula itself. This paper addresses itself to three topics, namely, the need for a unifying principle, the formulation of a principle for which a maximum consensus can be claimed, and a common curriculum that would implement the principle.","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"68 1","pages":"70 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Unity in a Pluralistic Society\",\"authors\":\"H. Broudy\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/443389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can we formulate a unifying principle for the public school in a fragmented, pluralistic society? I shall argue that we can. This answer is radical in both the loose and strict sense of the word. In the loose sense it is so unfashionable-at least with respect to the literature in professional education-as to be shocking. But an affirmative answer is also radical in that it goes to the root of the matter, namely, the continued existence of an American public school. In an age when educational questions and answers are shrouded in clouds of administrative complexity and bureaucratic sophistication, perhaps most astonishing is the simplicity, almost simplemindedness, of the formula itself. This paper addresses itself to three topics, namely, the need for a unifying principle, the formulation of a principle for which a maximum consensus can be claimed, and a common curriculum that would implement the principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"70 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/443389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在一个支离破碎、多元化的社会里,我们能否为公立学校制定一个统一的原则?我认为我们可以。无论从广义上还是严格意义上来说,这个答案都是激进的。从宽泛的意义上说,它是如此不合时宜——至少就专业教育文献而言——以至于令人震惊。但一个肯定的答案也是激进的,因为它触及了问题的根源,即美国公立学校的继续存在。在一个教育问题和答案被复杂的行政管理和官僚作风所笼罩的时代,也许最令人惊讶的是公式本身的简单,几乎是头脑简单。本文涉及三个主题,即,需要一个统一的原则,可以要求最大共识的原则的制定,以及一个将实施该原则的共同课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational Unity in a Pluralistic Society
Can we formulate a unifying principle for the public school in a fragmented, pluralistic society? I shall argue that we can. This answer is radical in both the loose and strict sense of the word. In the loose sense it is so unfashionable-at least with respect to the literature in professional education-as to be shocking. But an affirmative answer is also radical in that it goes to the root of the matter, namely, the continued existence of an American public school. In an age when educational questions and answers are shrouded in clouds of administrative complexity and bureaucratic sophistication, perhaps most astonishing is the simplicity, almost simplemindedness, of the formula itself. This paper addresses itself to three topics, namely, the need for a unifying principle, the formulation of a principle for which a maximum consensus can be claimed, and a common curriculum that would implement the principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信