教学评价的混合方法评价:基于课程的服务学习创新模式——项目评价能力

S. Hou
{"title":"教学评价的混合方法评价:基于课程的服务学习创新模式——项目评价能力","authors":"S. Hou","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: There is limited empirical study examines effective evaluation pedagogy on evaluation competency outcomes.  The purposes of this article are to: (1) identify key course design features critical to integrating real-world projects in a course-based service-learning model; and (2) provide empirical data using mixed methods evaluation to assess the impact on evaluation competencies.  Data from 5 cohort doctoral students (2015-2019; n=51) showed such course design resulted in significantly increased before-after course scores on the 6-item course learning objectives (scale item means of 3.34 vs 4.65; p<.001), and the 17-item program evaluation competency scale (PECS-17) (scale item means of 3.25 vs 4.76; p<.001).  Qualitative reflections on the 5 essential evaluation competency domains convergently were correlated with strong positive competency outcomes.  The convergent findings from both quantitative and qualitative data provide strong empirical evidence of evaluation competencies gained.  These findings have implications on teaching evaluation of graduate students for evaluator educators who strive to provide competency-based experiential learning.","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Teaching Evaluation: Innovative Course-Based Service-Learning Model on Program Evaluation Competencies\",\"authors\":\"S. Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: There is limited empirical study examines effective evaluation pedagogy on evaluation competency outcomes.  The purposes of this article are to: (1) identify key course design features critical to integrating real-world projects in a course-based service-learning model; and (2) provide empirical data using mixed methods evaluation to assess the impact on evaluation competencies.  Data from 5 cohort doctoral students (2015-2019; n=51) showed such course design resulted in significantly increased before-after course scores on the 6-item course learning objectives (scale item means of 3.34 vs 4.65; p<.001), and the 17-item program evaluation competency scale (PECS-17) (scale item means of 3.25 vs 4.76; p<.001).  Qualitative reflections on the 5 essential evaluation competency domains convergently were correlated with strong positive competency outcomes.  The convergent findings from both quantitative and qualitative data provide strong empirical evidence of evaluation competencies gained.  These findings have implications on teaching evaluation of graduate students for evaluator educators who strive to provide competency-based experiential learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:对评价能力结果的有效评价教学法的实证研究有限。本文的目的是:(1)确定关键的课程设计特征,这些特征对于将现实世界的项目整合到基于课程的服务学习模型中至关重要;(2)利用混合评价方法提供实证数据,评估对评价能力的影响。数据来自5名队列博士生(2015-2019;N =51)显示,这种课程设计导致6项课程学习目标的课程前后得分显著提高(量表项目均值为3.34 vs 4.65;p< 0.001),以及17项程序评估能力量表(PECS-17)(量表项目平均值3.25 vs 4.76;p <措施)。对5个基本评价能力域的定性反思与较强的积极胜任力结果收敛相关。来自定量和定性数据的趋同结果为获得的评估能力提供了强有力的经验证据。这些发现对那些努力提供基于能力的体验式学习的评估教育者的研究生教学评估具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Teaching Evaluation: Innovative Course-Based Service-Learning Model on Program Evaluation Competencies
Abstract: There is limited empirical study examines effective evaluation pedagogy on evaluation competency outcomes.  The purposes of this article are to: (1) identify key course design features critical to integrating real-world projects in a course-based service-learning model; and (2) provide empirical data using mixed methods evaluation to assess the impact on evaluation competencies.  Data from 5 cohort doctoral students (2015-2019; n=51) showed such course design resulted in significantly increased before-after course scores on the 6-item course learning objectives (scale item means of 3.34 vs 4.65; p<.001), and the 17-item program evaluation competency scale (PECS-17) (scale item means of 3.25 vs 4.76; p<.001).  Qualitative reflections on the 5 essential evaluation competency domains convergently were correlated with strong positive competency outcomes.  The convergent findings from both quantitative and qualitative data provide strong empirical evidence of evaluation competencies gained.  These findings have implications on teaching evaluation of graduate students for evaluator educators who strive to provide competency-based experiential learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信