公共采购中的“本土化”概念:公共采购法发展的全球趋势——以美国、南非和波兰为例

Jarek Kola
{"title":"公共采购中的“本土化”概念:公共采购法发展的全球趋势——以美国、南非和波兰为例","authors":"Jarek Kola","doi":"10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the approach to the functions of law in economy has significantly changed and is perceived more and more often as a tool (instrument) to accomplish various strategic goals of development policy. The aim of the paper is to discuss such legislative efforts as the latest and, given the EU perspective, the most interesting examples of instrumentalizing public procurement through the implementation of the ‘local content’ concept. Key observations from characterization of the US and South Africa relevant regulations were considered with respect to the legal environment in the EU and Poland. The main goal of this paper is to advance conclusions concerning the legal framework in which enacting local content requirements (LCRs) would be acceptable in the light of EU law. The paper shows that the applying of LCRs in public procurement procedures may be permitted in the EU, albeit to a limited extent. In the tender procedures taking place in the EU Member States, such solutions must respect the principle of proportionality in line with the EU public procurement law, stem from objectively justified needs of the contracting authority and – in all certainty – cannot pursue protectionist interests by limiting access to the procedure for contractors who do not meet certain LCRs.","PeriodicalId":34827,"journal":{"name":"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘local content’ concept in public procurement: global trends in the development of public procurement law on the example of the USA, South Africa and Poland\",\"authors\":\"Jarek Kola\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the approach to the functions of law in economy has significantly changed and is perceived more and more often as a tool (instrument) to accomplish various strategic goals of development policy. The aim of the paper is to discuss such legislative efforts as the latest and, given the EU perspective, the most interesting examples of instrumentalizing public procurement through the implementation of the ‘local content’ concept. Key observations from characterization of the US and South Africa relevant regulations were considered with respect to the legal environment in the EU and Poland. The main goal of this paper is to advance conclusions concerning the legal framework in which enacting local content requirements (LCRs) would be acceptable in the light of EU law. The paper shows that the applying of LCRs in public procurement procedures may be permitted in the EU, albeit to a limited extent. In the tender procedures taking place in the EU Member States, such solutions must respect the principle of proportionality in line with the EU public procurement law, stem from objectively justified needs of the contracting authority and – in all certainty – cannot pursue protectionist interests by limiting access to the procedure for contractors who do not meet certain LCRs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,对法律在经济中的作用的看法发生了重大变化,越来越多地被视为实现各种发展政策战略目标的工具(工具)。本文的目的是讨论这些立法努力,作为通过实施“本地内容”概念来工具化公共采购的最新和最有趣的例子,从欧盟的角度来看。从美国和南非相关法规的特征中得出的关键观察结果被考虑到欧盟和波兰的法律环境。本文的主要目标是提出有关法律框架的结论,在该法律框架中,根据欧盟法律,制定本地内容要求(lcr)是可以接受的。本文表明,尽管在有限的范围内,欧盟可能允许在公共采购程序中应用lcr。在欧盟成员国进行的招标程序中,这种解决办法必须尊重符合欧盟公共采购法的相称性原则,源于合同当局客观合理的需要,并且- -绝对不能通过限制不符合某些最低限度要求的承包商使用该程序来追求保护主义利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘local content’ concept in public procurement: global trends in the development of public procurement law on the example of the USA, South Africa and Poland
In recent years, the approach to the functions of law in economy has significantly changed and is perceived more and more often as a tool (instrument) to accomplish various strategic goals of development policy. The aim of the paper is to discuss such legislative efforts as the latest and, given the EU perspective, the most interesting examples of instrumentalizing public procurement through the implementation of the ‘local content’ concept. Key observations from characterization of the US and South Africa relevant regulations were considered with respect to the legal environment in the EU and Poland. The main goal of this paper is to advance conclusions concerning the legal framework in which enacting local content requirements (LCRs) would be acceptable in the light of EU law. The paper shows that the applying of LCRs in public procurement procedures may be permitted in the EU, albeit to a limited extent. In the tender procedures taking place in the EU Member States, such solutions must respect the principle of proportionality in line with the EU public procurement law, stem from objectively justified needs of the contracting authority and – in all certainty – cannot pursue protectionist interests by limiting access to the procedure for contractors who do not meet certain LCRs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信