种族与历史决定论:三个回合的论战

IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2022.0014
Feisal G. Mohamed
{"title":"种族与历史决定论:三个回合的论战","authors":"Feisal G. Mohamed","doi":"10.1353/elh.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Responding to recent work on race in early modern studies, this essay urges further scholarship more fully grounded in analysis of the emergence of racial capitalism. At the same time, it acknowledges the limits of the archive and explores the Black aesthetic thought responsive to such limits, namely Fred Moten's adjustments of Theodor Adorno. Inspired in part by the recent study Black Samson, the essay concludes by applying some of its remarks on methodology to John Milton's Samson Agonistes, which is shown to have a complex relationship to an early modern English culture of enslavement.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Race and Historicism: A Polemic in Three Turns\",\"authors\":\"Feisal G. Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/elh.2022.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Responding to recent work on race in early modern studies, this essay urges further scholarship more fully grounded in analysis of the emergence of racial capitalism. At the same time, it acknowledges the limits of the archive and explores the Black aesthetic thought responsive to such limits, namely Fred Moten's adjustments of Theodor Adorno. Inspired in part by the recent study Black Samson, the essay concludes by applying some of its remarks on methodology to John Milton's Samson Agonistes, which is shown to have a complex relationship to an early modern English culture of enslavement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:针对最近在早期现代研究中关于种族的工作,本文敦促进一步的学术研究更充分地基于对种族资本主义出现的分析。同时,它承认档案的局限性,并探索回应这种局限性的黑人美学思想,即弗雷德·莫滕对西奥多·阿多诺的调整。受最近研究《黑参孙》(Black Samson)的部分启发,这篇文章最后将其对约翰·弥尔顿(John Milton)的《参孙阿贡尼斯提斯》(Samson Agonistes)的一些方法论评论应用到这篇文章中,这篇文章被证明与早期现代英国奴隶制文化有着复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Race and Historicism: A Polemic in Three Turns
Abstract:Responding to recent work on race in early modern studies, this essay urges further scholarship more fully grounded in analysis of the emergence of racial capitalism. At the same time, it acknowledges the limits of the archive and explores the Black aesthetic thought responsive to such limits, namely Fred Moten's adjustments of Theodor Adorno. Inspired in part by the recent study Black Samson, the essay concludes by applying some of its remarks on methodology to John Milton's Samson Agonistes, which is shown to have a complex relationship to an early modern English culture of enslavement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信