氯菊酯- ec与氯菊酯- ec +纤维素在砂壤土中的平流比较

IF 0.3 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY
B. Kard
{"title":"氯菊酯- ec与氯菊酯- ec +纤维素在砂壤土中的平流比较","authors":"B. Kard","doi":"10.3958/059.048.0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Two formulations of permethrin EC termiticide were evaluated for depth of penetration into sandy-loam soil following by-the-label aqueous applications to the soil surface. The termiticide formulations were the same, except one formulation contained finely powdered cellulose and the other did not. Formulations were applied separately at 0.25% and 0.50% a.i. and allowed 7 to 9 days to disperse into the soil before samples were extracted and a.i. residues from various depths near the soil surface determined. Residue analyses for both formulations determined that 100% of a.i. recovered was contained in the top 5.1 cm of soil. Residues in the top 1.3 cm of soil were 95.2 to 96.9% of a.i. recovered. In the top 5.1 cm of soil, residue of permethrin plus powdered cellulose formulation applied at 0.50% was significantly greater than permethrin without cellulose additive.","PeriodicalId":21930,"journal":{"name":"Southwestern Entomologist","volume":"114 1","pages":"325 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advection of Permethrin-EC Compared with Permethrin-EC+Cellulose in Sandy-Loam Soil\",\"authors\":\"B. Kard\",\"doi\":\"10.3958/059.048.0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Two formulations of permethrin EC termiticide were evaluated for depth of penetration into sandy-loam soil following by-the-label aqueous applications to the soil surface. The termiticide formulations were the same, except one formulation contained finely powdered cellulose and the other did not. Formulations were applied separately at 0.25% and 0.50% a.i. and allowed 7 to 9 days to disperse into the soil before samples were extracted and a.i. residues from various depths near the soil surface determined. Residue analyses for both formulations determined that 100% of a.i. recovered was contained in the top 5.1 cm of soil. Residues in the top 1.3 cm of soil were 95.2 to 96.9% of a.i. recovered. In the top 5.1 cm of soil, residue of permethrin plus powdered cellulose formulation applied at 0.50% was significantly greater than permethrin without cellulose additive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southwestern Entomologist\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"325 - 332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southwestern Entomologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3958/059.048.0205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwestern Entomologist","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3958/059.048.0205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要对两种配方的氯菊酯EC杀菌剂进行了渗透深度评估,并按标签在土壤表面水施用。除一种配方含有细粉末状纤维素而另一种配方不含纤维素外,其他配方相同。配方分别以0.25%和0.50% a.i.应用,并允许7至9天分散到土壤中,然后提取样品并测定土壤表面附近不同深度的a.i.残留物。对两种配方的残留分析表明,100%的a.i.都包含在5.1厘米的土壤中。土壤表层1.3 cm的残留量占回收量的95.2% ~ 96.9%。在土壤表层5.1 cm处,掺纤维素粉的氯菊酯用量为0.50%,残留量显著大于不掺纤维素粉的氯菊酯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advection of Permethrin-EC Compared with Permethrin-EC+Cellulose in Sandy-Loam Soil
Abstract. Two formulations of permethrin EC termiticide were evaluated for depth of penetration into sandy-loam soil following by-the-label aqueous applications to the soil surface. The termiticide formulations were the same, except one formulation contained finely powdered cellulose and the other did not. Formulations were applied separately at 0.25% and 0.50% a.i. and allowed 7 to 9 days to disperse into the soil before samples were extracted and a.i. residues from various depths near the soil surface determined. Residue analyses for both formulations determined that 100% of a.i. recovered was contained in the top 5.1 cm of soil. Residues in the top 1.3 cm of soil were 95.2 to 96.9% of a.i. recovered. In the top 5.1 cm of soil, residue of permethrin plus powdered cellulose formulation applied at 0.50% was significantly greater than permethrin without cellulose additive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southwestern Entomologist
Southwestern Entomologist 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts submitted for consideration for publication in the Southwestern Entomologist should report results of entomological research in the southwestern United States or Mexico or should report results of studies on entomological species, relevant to this region, which may be done elsewhere, provided such results are geographically applicable. Manuscripts that report results of routine laboratory or field experiments for which the primary purpose is gathering baseline data or those that report results of a continuous evaluation program such as preliminary pesticide evaluation experiments, species lists with no supporting biological data, or preliminary plant resistance evaluations are not acceptable. However, reports of experiments with insecticides, acaricides, and microbials are acceptable if they are comprehensive and include data related to economics, resistance, toxicology, or other broad subject areas. Bibliographies will not be published in Southwestern Entomologist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信