STOP-Bang和STOP-Bag问卷对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险分层的比较

IF 1.5 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
R. Waseem, Yasser Salama, M. Baltzan, F. Chung
{"title":"STOP-Bang和STOP-Bag问卷对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险分层的比较","authors":"R. Waseem, Yasser Salama, M. Baltzan, F. Chung","doi":"10.1080/24745332.2022.2057883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high BP, BMI, age, neck circumference, and male gender (STOP-Bang) questionnaire is used widely to screen individuals at high risk of OSA. The objective of the study is to examine the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire versus the STOP-Bag (without neck circumference) questionnaire. We hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire would be higher than STOP-Bag questionnaire. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included patients from two preoperative clinics. All participants completed the STOP-Bang questionnaire and underwent polysomnography (PSG). The diagnostic parameters were calculated for the STOP-Bang questionnaire and the STOP-Bag questionnaire versus polysomnography as the reference standard. RESULTS: There were 203 patients with mean age of 57 ± 13 years and 51% were male. The STOP-Bang questionnaire had a significantly higher area under receiver operating curve than the STOP-Bag questionnaire (0.782 vs 0.758, P < 0.05) in detection of mild to severe OSA in surgical patients. Similarly, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had significantly higher sensitivity when compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire (85.5% vs 81.3%, P < 0.05). The area under the curve for screening moderate-to-severe and severe OSA was not significantly different for STOP-Bang and STOP-Bag questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire, the STOP-Bang questionnaire has higher diagnostic performance in predicting all OSA, but the 2 questionnaires were similar for moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The STOP-Bag questionnaire can be used for screening OSA when neck circumference measurement is not feasible.","PeriodicalId":9471,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"359 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of STOP-Bang and STOP-Bag questionnaires in stratifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea\",\"authors\":\"R. Waseem, Yasser Salama, M. Baltzan, F. Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24745332.2022.2057883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high BP, BMI, age, neck circumference, and male gender (STOP-Bang) questionnaire is used widely to screen individuals at high risk of OSA. The objective of the study is to examine the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire versus the STOP-Bag (without neck circumference) questionnaire. We hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire would be higher than STOP-Bag questionnaire. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included patients from two preoperative clinics. All participants completed the STOP-Bang questionnaire and underwent polysomnography (PSG). The diagnostic parameters were calculated for the STOP-Bang questionnaire and the STOP-Bag questionnaire versus polysomnography as the reference standard. RESULTS: There were 203 patients with mean age of 57 ± 13 years and 51% were male. The STOP-Bang questionnaire had a significantly higher area under receiver operating curve than the STOP-Bag questionnaire (0.782 vs 0.758, P < 0.05) in detection of mild to severe OSA in surgical patients. Similarly, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had significantly higher sensitivity when compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire (85.5% vs 81.3%, P < 0.05). The area under the curve for screening moderate-to-severe and severe OSA was not significantly different for STOP-Bang and STOP-Bag questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire, the STOP-Bang questionnaire has higher diagnostic performance in predicting all OSA, but the 2 questionnaires were similar for moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The STOP-Bag questionnaire can be used for screening OSA when neck circumference measurement is not feasible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"359 - 366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2022.2057883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2022.2057883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由与目的:stopbang (STOP-Bang)问卷广泛用于筛查OSA高危人群,包括打鼾、疲倦、观察到的呼吸暂停、高血压、BMI、年龄、颈围、男性性别。本研究的目的是检查STOP-Bang问卷与STOP-Bag(无颈围)问卷的诊断性能。我们假设STOP-Bang问卷的诊断效能会高于STOP-Bag问卷。方法:对两家术前诊所的患者进行回顾性研究。所有的参与者都完成了STOP-Bang问卷,并进行了多导睡眠描记术(PSG)。计算STOP-Bang问卷和STOP-Bag问卷与多导睡眠图作为参考标准的诊断参数。结果:203例患者平均年龄57±13岁,男性占51%。STOP-Bang问卷在检测手术患者轻至重度OSA时,受试者操作曲线下面积明显高于STOP-Bag问卷(0.782 vs 0.758, P < 0.05)。同样,STOP-Bang问卷比STOP-Bag问卷具有更高的敏感性(85.5% vs 81.3%, P < 0.05)。在STOP-Bang和STOP-Bag问卷中,筛选中重度和重度OSA的曲线下面积差异无统计学意义。结论:与STOP-Bag问卷相比,STOP-Bang问卷在预测所有OSA方面具有更高的诊断效能,但两种问卷对中重度和重度OSA的诊断效果相似。当颈围测量不可行时,STOP-Bag问卷可用于筛查OSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of STOP-Bang and STOP-Bag questionnaires in stratifying risk of obstructive sleep apnea
Abstract RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high BP, BMI, age, neck circumference, and male gender (STOP-Bang) questionnaire is used widely to screen individuals at high risk of OSA. The objective of the study is to examine the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire versus the STOP-Bag (without neck circumference) questionnaire. We hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire would be higher than STOP-Bag questionnaire. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included patients from two preoperative clinics. All participants completed the STOP-Bang questionnaire and underwent polysomnography (PSG). The diagnostic parameters were calculated for the STOP-Bang questionnaire and the STOP-Bag questionnaire versus polysomnography as the reference standard. RESULTS: There were 203 patients with mean age of 57 ± 13 years and 51% were male. The STOP-Bang questionnaire had a significantly higher area under receiver operating curve than the STOP-Bag questionnaire (0.782 vs 0.758, P < 0.05) in detection of mild to severe OSA in surgical patients. Similarly, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had significantly higher sensitivity when compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire (85.5% vs 81.3%, P < 0.05). The area under the curve for screening moderate-to-severe and severe OSA was not significantly different for STOP-Bang and STOP-Bag questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Compared to the STOP-Bag questionnaire, the STOP-Bang questionnaire has higher diagnostic performance in predicting all OSA, but the 2 questionnaires were similar for moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The STOP-Bag questionnaire can be used for screening OSA when neck circumference measurement is not feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信