关于争论和讨论。

J. Solomon
{"title":"关于争论和讨论。","authors":"J. Solomon","doi":"10.4324/9781315169996-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strictly logical argument can be confrontational and destructive, but for the discussions needed in science classrooms each student contributes rational inputs in a collaborative manner, always trying to see what the other person means. Differences of opinion, especially when social and ethical issues are involved, can be weighed up and often resolved, if each student carefully explains the reasons for their opinion. Such discussions are very valuable to learning, and may be useful when experts give different opinions about a contentious topical matter. Examples are given from students' discussions about social issues.","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"113 1","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"About Argument and Discussion.\",\"authors\":\"J. Solomon\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315169996-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strictly logical argument can be confrontational and destructive, but for the discussions needed in science classrooms each student contributes rational inputs in a collaborative manner, always trying to see what the other person means. Differences of opinion, especially when social and ethical issues are involved, can be weighed up and often resolved, if each student carefully explains the reasons for their opinion. Such discussions are very valuable to learning, and may be useful when experts give different opinions about a contentious topical matter. Examples are given from students' discussions about social issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"57-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169996-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169996-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

严格的逻辑论证可能是对抗性的和破坏性的,但对于科学课堂上需要的讨论,每个学生都以合作的方式提供理性的输入,总是试图理解对方的意思。意见的分歧,特别是涉及到社会和道德问题时,如果每个学生都仔细解释他们意见的原因,就可以权衡并经常解决。这样的讨论对学习是非常有价值的,当专家们对一个有争议的话题给出不同的意见时,这种讨论可能会很有用。从学生对社会问题的讨论中给出例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
About Argument and Discussion.
Strictly logical argument can be confrontational and destructive, but for the discussions needed in science classrooms each student contributes rational inputs in a collaborative manner, always trying to see what the other person means. Differences of opinion, especially when social and ethical issues are involved, can be weighed up and often resolved, if each student carefully explains the reasons for their opinion. Such discussions are very valuable to learning, and may be useful when experts give different opinions about a contentious topical matter. Examples are given from students' discussions about social issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信