为什么协商制定规则仍然至关重要:采访苏珊·波德兹巴

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1002/alt.21965

Russ Bleemer

{"title":"为什么协商制定规则仍然至关重要:采访苏珊·波德兹巴","authors":"Russ Bleemer","doi":"10.1002/alt.21965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Negotiated rulemaking, at its heart, is an alternative dispute resolution process, often dependent upon mediation techniques to gain input from stakeholders who will be subject to regulatory processes. The goal is to produce an oversight process that interested parties can live with and that serves whatever the public purposes are in issuing the rules.</p>","PeriodicalId":100074,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","volume":"40 9","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Negotiated Rulemaking Is Still Vital: An Interview with Susan Podziba\",\"authors\":\"Russ Bleemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alt.21965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Negotiated rulemaking, at its heart, is an alternative dispute resolution process, often dependent upon mediation techniques to gain input from stakeholders who will be subject to regulatory processes. The goal is to produce an oversight process that interested parties can live with and that serves whatever the public purposes are in issuing the rules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"volume\":\"40 9\",\"pages\":\"137-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alt.21965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

协商制定规则的核心是一种替代性争议解决程序，通常依赖于调解技术，以获得将受监管程序约束的利益攸关方的意见。其目标是建立一个利益相关方可以接受的监督程序，并服务于发布规则的任何公共目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Why Negotiated Rulemaking Is Still Vital: An Interview with Susan Podziba

Negotiated rulemaking, at its heart, is an alternative dispute resolution process, often dependent upon mediation techniques to gain input from stakeholders who will be subject to regulatory processes. The goal is to produce an oversight process that interested parties can live with and that serves whatever the public purposes are in issuing the rules.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation

自引率

0.00%

发文量