变形链球菌在两种胶结剂固定的临时冠中的浸润——先导双盲随机临床试验

A. Rego, Vanessa Anielly Cruz Moura, J. Prado, F. Alexandrino, R. R. Regis, K. M. D. O. Pontes
{"title":"变形链球菌在两种胶结剂固定的临时冠中的浸润——先导双盲随机临床试验","authors":"A. Rego, Vanessa Anielly Cruz Moura, J. Prado, F. Alexandrino, R. R. Regis, K. M. D. O. Pontes","doi":"10.12662/2317-3076JHBS.V9I1.3562.P%P.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : When provisional acrylic crowns are used for a long time, they become more susceptible to marginal leakage by cariogenic bacteria. The objectives of this pilot clinical study were to compare cement based on zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide by contamination with Streptococcus mutans, and calculate the sample size for the continuation of this study. Methods : Individuals receiving provisional crowns and following inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomly distributed into 2 groups: zinc oxide-eugenol (n=8); calcium hydroxide (n=9). The temporary crowns were made by a blind researcher and cemented by another. Patients were also blinded by the cement used inside their crowns. After 2 months, a cement sample from the crowns’ peripheral inner face was collected, placed in a tube containing 1 mL of sterile saline, serially diluted, plated on Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar, and incubated for 48 hours. Colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were counted. A statistical power analysis was performed to calculate sample size (1-β=80%) and the Mann Whitney test to compare both cements (α=0.05). Results : Both cements were contaminated with S. mutans, with an average of 166.6 x 102 CFU/mL for calcium hydroxide and 435.3 x 102 CFU/mL for zinc oxide-eugenol, with no significant difference (p=0.311). The sample size calculated for this study was 36 per group. Conclusion : This pilot study suggests that there is important contamination inside provisional crowns used for two months, independent of the cement. The continuation of this study is needed, with a bigger sample size, to enable a comparison between the cements.","PeriodicalId":16071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","volume":"112 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infiltration by Streptococcus mutans in provisional crowns fixed by two types of cementing agents – pilot double-blind randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"A. Rego, Vanessa Anielly Cruz Moura, J. Prado, F. Alexandrino, R. R. Regis, K. M. D. O. Pontes\",\"doi\":\"10.12662/2317-3076JHBS.V9I1.3562.P%P.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : When provisional acrylic crowns are used for a long time, they become more susceptible to marginal leakage by cariogenic bacteria. The objectives of this pilot clinical study were to compare cement based on zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide by contamination with Streptococcus mutans, and calculate the sample size for the continuation of this study. Methods : Individuals receiving provisional crowns and following inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomly distributed into 2 groups: zinc oxide-eugenol (n=8); calcium hydroxide (n=9). The temporary crowns were made by a blind researcher and cemented by another. Patients were also blinded by the cement used inside their crowns. After 2 months, a cement sample from the crowns’ peripheral inner face was collected, placed in a tube containing 1 mL of sterile saline, serially diluted, plated on Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar, and incubated for 48 hours. Colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were counted. A statistical power analysis was performed to calculate sample size (1-β=80%) and the Mann Whitney test to compare both cements (α=0.05). Results : Both cements were contaminated with S. mutans, with an average of 166.6 x 102 CFU/mL for calcium hydroxide and 435.3 x 102 CFU/mL for zinc oxide-eugenol, with no significant difference (p=0.311). The sample size calculated for this study was 36 per group. Conclusion : This pilot study suggests that there is important contamination inside provisional crowns used for two months, independent of the cement. The continuation of this study is needed, with a bigger sample size, to enable a comparison between the cements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076JHBS.V9I1.3562.P%P.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076JHBS.V9I1.3562.P%P.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:长期使用临时丙烯牙冠,易因牙源性细菌而发生牙缘渗漏。本初步临床研究的目的是比较氧化锌-丁香酚水泥和氢氧化钙水泥受变形链球菌污染的情况,并计算本研究继续进行的样本量。方法:接受临时冠治疗并符合纳入/排除标准的患者随机分为2组:氧化锌-丁香酚组(n=8);氢氧化钙(n=9)。这些临时的牙冠是由一位盲人研究人员制作的,并由另一位盲人进行粘接。患者还会因冠内使用的水泥而失明。2个月后,收集牙冠周围内表面的水泥样品,放入装有1 mL无菌生理盐水的管中,连续稀释,涂于Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin琼脂上,孵育48小时。计数菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)。采用统计功效分析计算样本量(1-β=80%), Mann Whitney检验比较两种水泥(α=0.05)。结果:两种骨水泥均存在变形链球菌污染,氢氧化钙平均为166.6 × 102 CFU/mL,氧化锌-丁香酚平均为435.3 × 102 CFU/mL,差异无统计学意义(p=0.311)。本研究计算的样本量为每组36人。结论:这项初步研究表明,使用两个月的临时冠内存在重要的污染,独立于水泥。这项研究需要继续进行,样本量更大,以便对水泥进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infiltration by Streptococcus mutans in provisional crowns fixed by two types of cementing agents – pilot double-blind randomized clinical trial
Objective : When provisional acrylic crowns are used for a long time, they become more susceptible to marginal leakage by cariogenic bacteria. The objectives of this pilot clinical study were to compare cement based on zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide by contamination with Streptococcus mutans, and calculate the sample size for the continuation of this study. Methods : Individuals receiving provisional crowns and following inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomly distributed into 2 groups: zinc oxide-eugenol (n=8); calcium hydroxide (n=9). The temporary crowns were made by a blind researcher and cemented by another. Patients were also blinded by the cement used inside their crowns. After 2 months, a cement sample from the crowns’ peripheral inner face was collected, placed in a tube containing 1 mL of sterile saline, serially diluted, plated on Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar, and incubated for 48 hours. Colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were counted. A statistical power analysis was performed to calculate sample size (1-β=80%) and the Mann Whitney test to compare both cements (α=0.05). Results : Both cements were contaminated with S. mutans, with an average of 166.6 x 102 CFU/mL for calcium hydroxide and 435.3 x 102 CFU/mL for zinc oxide-eugenol, with no significant difference (p=0.311). The sample size calculated for this study was 36 per group. Conclusion : This pilot study suggests that there is important contamination inside provisional crowns used for two months, independent of the cement. The continuation of this study is needed, with a bigger sample size, to enable a comparison between the cements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信