Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin
{"title":"基础盆土室内压实与砂锥试验研究","authors":"Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin","doi":"10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction of model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³","PeriodicalId":21574,"journal":{"name":"Science Proceedings Series","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Experimental Study of Laboratory Compaction and Sand Cone on Foundation Tub Soil\",\"authors\":\"Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin\",\"doi\":\"10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction of model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³\",\"PeriodicalId\":21574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Proceedings Series\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Proceedings Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Proceedings Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
土壤是一种非常重要的材料,因此它必须能够支撑它上面的载荷,因此土壤必须具有足够好的土壤承载能力。在本研究中,将室内压实法与砂锥法进行了土壤压实比较。研究的目的是了解土壤的特性,并将实验室压实与基础桶中的砂锥压实进行比较。土是从同一点绘制的普罗克托测试和沙锥测试。该试验结果用于基础模型试验。实验室特性测试:含水率、密度、稠度限值(LL、PL)、筛分分析、比重计、实验室压实和砂锥。研究结果发现,基于AASHTO分类的土壤类型为A-7-5,基于unfield土壤分类系统(USCS)的土壤类型为MH,实验室压实(Proctor Test)的平均含水率为32.26%,γd最大值为1.33 g/cm³,无基础土壤模型地基试验的沙cone压实度为1.36 g/cm³,垂直排列的轮胎基础为1.36 g/cm³,水平排列的轮胎底泥为1.36 g /cm³
A Experimental Study of Laboratory Compaction and Sand Cone on Foundation Tub Soil
Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction of model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³