基础盆土室内压实与砂锥试验研究

Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin
{"title":"基础盆土室内压实与砂锥试验研究","authors":"Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin","doi":"10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and  sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction  of  model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation  ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³","PeriodicalId":21574,"journal":{"name":"Science Proceedings Series","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Experimental Study of Laboratory Compaction and Sand Cone on Foundation Tub Soil\",\"authors\":\"Meti, T. Harianto, A. R. Djamaluddin, A. B. Muhiddin\",\"doi\":\"10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and  sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction  of  model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation  ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³\",\"PeriodicalId\":21574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Proceedings Series\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Proceedings Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Proceedings Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31580/sps.v3i1.1953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤是一种非常重要的材料,因此它必须能够支撑它上面的载荷,因此土壤必须具有足够好的土壤承载能力。在本研究中,将室内压实法与砂锥法进行了土壤压实比较。研究的目的是了解土壤的特性,并将实验室压实与基础桶中的砂锥压实进行比较。土是从同一点绘制的普罗克托测试和沙锥测试。该试验结果用于基础模型试验。实验室特性测试:含水率、密度、稠度限值(LL、PL)、筛分分析、比重计、实验室压实和砂锥。研究结果发现,基于AASHTO分类的土壤类型为A-7-5,基于unfield土壤分类系统(USCS)的土壤类型为MH,实验室压实(Proctor Test)的平均含水率为32.26%,γd最大值为1.33 g/cm³,无基础土壤模型地基试验的沙cone压实度为1.36 g/cm³,垂直排列的轮胎基础为1.36 g/cm³,水平排列的轮胎底泥为1.36 g /cm³
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Experimental Study of Laboratory Compaction and Sand Cone on Foundation Tub Soil
Soil is a very important material so that it must be able to support the loads above it, so the soil must have a sufficiently good soil bearing capacity. In this study, the soil compaction was compared with the laboratory compaction method with the sandcone method. The objectives of the study were knowing the characteristics of the soil and knowing the laboratory compaction compares with the sandcone compaction in the foundation tub. Soil is drawn from the same point for the Proctor Test and Sand cone Test. The results of this test are used in the foundation model test. Characteristics testing in the laboratory: moisture content, density, consistency limits (LL, PL), sieve analysis, hydrometer, laboratory compaction and  sandcone. Research result It was found that the soil type was based on the AASHTO classification was A-7-5 and the soil classification based on the Unifield Soil Classification System (USCS) was MH. Laboratory compaction (Proctor Test) average moisture content of 32.26%, γd maximum 1.33 g/cm³, and the sandcone compaction  of  model foundation test of soil without foundation ɣd was 1.36 g/cm³ , Vertically arranged tire foundation ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³ , horizontally arranged tire foundation  ɣd was 1.36 g /cm³
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信