“企业本质”的回归:董事会的角色

IF 1.4 Q3 ECONOMICS
P. Goorha
{"title":"“企业本质”的回归:董事会的角色","authors":"P. Goorha","doi":"10.31585/jbba-1-1-(2)2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this note, I return to Coase (1937), on its 80th anniversary, to assess whether its logic and insight can be reconciled with the blockchain revolution. I argue that, indeed, it can, and propose the existence of a third method of organizing economic activity in a specialized exchange economy, in addition to the two that Coase considered. I call it the cryptographic stigmergy. If there be such merit in the argument here, let it be dedicated to the memory of Ronald Coase.","PeriodicalId":33145,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Return of ‘The Nature of the Firm’: The Role of the Blockchain\",\"authors\":\"P. Goorha\",\"doi\":\"10.31585/jbba-1-1-(2)2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this note, I return to Coase (1937), on its 80th anniversary, to assess whether its logic and insight can be reconciled with the blockchain revolution. I argue that, indeed, it can, and propose the existence of a third method of organizing economic activity in a specialized exchange economy, in addition to the two that Coase considered. I call it the cryptographic stigmergy. If there be such merit in the argument here, let it be dedicated to the memory of Ronald Coase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-1-1-(2)2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-1-1-(2)2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将在科斯(1937)发表80周年之际回到科斯,以评估其逻辑和洞察力是否可以与区块链革命相协调。我认为,事实上,它可以,并提出存在第三种方法组织经济活动的专业化交换经济,除了科斯所考虑的两种。我把它叫做密码耻辱症。如果这里的论点有这样的优点,那就让我们把它献给罗纳德·科斯吧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Return of ‘The Nature of the Firm’: The Role of the Blockchain
In this note, I return to Coase (1937), on its 80th anniversary, to assess whether its logic and insight can be reconciled with the blockchain revolution. I argue that, indeed, it can, and propose the existence of a third method of organizing economic activity in a specialized exchange economy, in addition to the two that Coase considered. I call it the cryptographic stigmergy. If there be such merit in the argument here, let it be dedicated to the memory of Ronald Coase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信