关于双重所有权的法律解决方案涉及公共利益的土地解放

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ade Slamet Riadi, Irawan Soerdjo, A. Yani
{"title":"关于双重所有权的法律解决方案涉及公共利益的土地解放","authors":"Ade Slamet Riadi, Irawan Soerdjo, A. Yani","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The land issue is a problem that is most closely related to the basic rights of the community. Land acquisition for the use of public interest is related to land that has a social function. Along with the high value and benefits of land, many people try to obtain proof of land ownership by having fake certificates, where the data on the certificate does not match what is in the land book. This study uses a normative juridical method which is supported by empirical juridical. Based on the results of research on court decisions Number 482/Pdt/2018/Pt.Bdg. shows that legal certainty over the dual ownership certificate has been achieved with the judge's decision granting the Plaintiff/Plaintiff's claim as the owner of the original land rights. Therefore, the National Land Agency must be more careful in making physical data and juridical data in carrying out the land registration process, and also for the next case the judge is more careful in examining the chronology of the occurrence of ownership of land rights, because it involves the certainty of the subject and object of ownership of rights. over the ground.","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Kepemilikan Ganda Terkait Dengan Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum\",\"authors\":\"Ade Slamet Riadi, Irawan Soerdjo, A. Yani\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The land issue is a problem that is most closely related to the basic rights of the community. Land acquisition for the use of public interest is related to land that has a social function. Along with the high value and benefits of land, many people try to obtain proof of land ownership by having fake certificates, where the data on the certificate does not match what is in the land book. This study uses a normative juridical method which is supported by empirical juridical. Based on the results of research on court decisions Number 482/Pdt/2018/Pt.Bdg. shows that legal certainty over the dual ownership certificate has been achieved with the judge's decision granting the Plaintiff/Plaintiff's claim as the owner of the original land rights. Therefore, the National Land Agency must be more careful in making physical data and juridical data in carrying out the land registration process, and also for the next case the judge is more careful in examining the chronology of the occurrence of ownership of land rights, because it involves the certainty of the subject and object of ownership of rights. over the ground.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地问题是一个与社会基本权利关系最为密切的问题。为公共利益目的征用土地,涉及具有社会功能的土地。随着土地的高价值和收益,许多人试图通过伪造证书来获得土地所有权的证明,这些证书上的数据与土地簿上的数据不符。本研究采用以实证法学为支撑的规范法学方法。基于对第482/Pdt/2018/Pt.Bdg号法院判决的研究结果。表明,随着法官决定授予原告/原告作为原始土地权利所有者的主张,双重所有权证书的法律确定性已经实现。因此,国家土地局在进行土地登记过程中必须更加仔细地制作实物数据和法律数据,并且对于下一个案件,法官在审查土地权利所有权发生的年表时也要更加仔细,因为这涉及到权利所有权主体和客体的确定性。在地面上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Kepemilikan Ganda Terkait Dengan Pembebasan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum
The land issue is a problem that is most closely related to the basic rights of the community. Land acquisition for the use of public interest is related to land that has a social function. Along with the high value and benefits of land, many people try to obtain proof of land ownership by having fake certificates, where the data on the certificate does not match what is in the land book. This study uses a normative juridical method which is supported by empirical juridical. Based on the results of research on court decisions Number 482/Pdt/2018/Pt.Bdg. shows that legal certainty over the dual ownership certificate has been achieved with the judge's decision granting the Plaintiff/Plaintiff's claim as the owner of the original land rights. Therefore, the National Land Agency must be more careful in making physical data and juridical data in carrying out the land registration process, and also for the next case the judge is more careful in examining the chronology of the occurrence of ownership of land rights, because it involves the certainty of the subject and object of ownership of rights. over the ground.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信