从文化敏感的角度对精神卫生研究规程进行伦理审查的准则

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
F. Nabil, Mercury Shitindo
{"title":"从文化敏感的角度对精神卫生研究规程进行伦理审查的准则","authors":"F. Nabil, Mercury Shitindo","doi":"10.58177/ajb2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most of Africa, mental illness is considered a silent epidemic due to structural and systemic barriers such as inadequate health care infrastructure, insufficient number of mental health specialists, stigma and discrimination related to mental illness, and lack of access to all levels of care. The continued suffering and disability due to mental illness calls for newer treatments and continued research into the field of mental health treatment and therapy. Research ethics committees are cognizant of the importance of this aspect yet, the road to this innovative future is fraught with ethical dilemmas as well as ethical, legal, and social implications. There is an urgent need to have guidelines that give guidance to research ethics involving mental health participants. Guidelines were developed for the ethical review of mental health research protocols with the aim of increasing health equity and access in Africa and other low-income countries. We systematically analyzed 13 programme, research, and policy evaluation tools in light of mental health and cultural attributes. A 54-item assessment tool was created to guide the process of mental health research protocol evaluation taking into account ethical, gender, and sociocultural factors in Africa. The emerging themes i.e. research governance, background and justification, methodology and ethical impact of the research forming the basis of the assessment tool are interlinked with the bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. When they are applied to the evaluation of a study they will not only underscore these principles, they enhance their application and increase access to equitable health in Africa and other low-resource settings regardless of the varied contexts.","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for the ethical review of mental health research protocols from a culturally-sensitive perspective\",\"authors\":\"F. Nabil, Mercury Shitindo\",\"doi\":\"10.58177/ajb2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most of Africa, mental illness is considered a silent epidemic due to structural and systemic barriers such as inadequate health care infrastructure, insufficient number of mental health specialists, stigma and discrimination related to mental illness, and lack of access to all levels of care. The continued suffering and disability due to mental illness calls for newer treatments and continued research into the field of mental health treatment and therapy. Research ethics committees are cognizant of the importance of this aspect yet, the road to this innovative future is fraught with ethical dilemmas as well as ethical, legal, and social implications. There is an urgent need to have guidelines that give guidance to research ethics involving mental health participants. Guidelines were developed for the ethical review of mental health research protocols with the aim of increasing health equity and access in Africa and other low-income countries. We systematically analyzed 13 programme, research, and policy evaluation tools in light of mental health and cultural attributes. A 54-item assessment tool was created to guide the process of mental health research protocol evaluation taking into account ethical, gender, and sociocultural factors in Africa. The emerging themes i.e. research governance, background and justification, methodology and ethical impact of the research forming the basis of the assessment tool are interlinked with the bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. When they are applied to the evaluation of a study they will not only underscore these principles, they enhance their application and increase access to equitable health in Africa and other low-resource settings regardless of the varied contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58177/ajb2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58177/ajb2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲大部分地区,由于保健基础设施不足、精神卫生专家人数不足、与精神疾病有关的耻辱和歧视以及无法获得各级保健等结构性和系统性障碍,精神疾病被认为是一种无声的流行病。由于精神疾病造成的持续痛苦和残疾,需要新的治疗方法,并在精神健康治疗和治疗领域继续进行研究。研究伦理委员会认识到这方面的重要性,然而,通往这一创新未来的道路充满了伦理困境,以及伦理、法律和社会影响。迫切需要制定指导方针,为涉及精神卫生参与者的研究伦理提供指导。为精神卫生研究规程的伦理审查制定了准则,目的是增加非洲和其他低收入国家的卫生公平和获得机会。根据心理健康和文化属性,我们系统地分析了13个项目、研究和政策评估工具。创建了一个包含54个项目的评估工具,以指导精神卫生研究议定书评估进程,同时考虑到非洲的伦理、性别和社会文化因素。新兴主题,即研究治理、背景和理由、方法和研究的伦理影响,构成评估工具的基础,与尊重自主、仁慈、无害和正义的生物伦理原则相互关联。当它们被应用于一项研究的评价时,它们不仅强调了这些原则,而且加强了这些原则的应用,并在非洲和其他资源匮乏的环境中增加了获得公平保健的机会,无论其背景如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for the ethical review of mental health research protocols from a culturally-sensitive perspective
In most of Africa, mental illness is considered a silent epidemic due to structural and systemic barriers such as inadequate health care infrastructure, insufficient number of mental health specialists, stigma and discrimination related to mental illness, and lack of access to all levels of care. The continued suffering and disability due to mental illness calls for newer treatments and continued research into the field of mental health treatment and therapy. Research ethics committees are cognizant of the importance of this aspect yet, the road to this innovative future is fraught with ethical dilemmas as well as ethical, legal, and social implications. There is an urgent need to have guidelines that give guidance to research ethics involving mental health participants. Guidelines were developed for the ethical review of mental health research protocols with the aim of increasing health equity and access in Africa and other low-income countries. We systematically analyzed 13 programme, research, and policy evaluation tools in light of mental health and cultural attributes. A 54-item assessment tool was created to guide the process of mental health research protocol evaluation taking into account ethical, gender, and sociocultural factors in Africa. The emerging themes i.e. research governance, background and justification, methodology and ethical impact of the research forming the basis of the assessment tool are interlinked with the bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. When they are applied to the evaluation of a study they will not only underscore these principles, they enhance their application and increase access to equitable health in Africa and other low-resource settings regardless of the varied contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信