专题研究及其在立陶宛社会学中的地位

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Lilija Kublickienė, A. Žvinklienė
{"title":"专题研究及其在立陶宛社会学中的地位","authors":"Lilija Kublickienė, A. Žvinklienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.","PeriodicalId":43648,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija-Sociologija","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monographic Research and its Place in Lithuanian Sociology\",\"authors\":\"Lilija Kublickienė, A. Žvinklienė\",\"doi\":\"10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofija-Sociologija\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofija-Sociologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija-Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对专题研究方法的概念进行了界定,并介绍了专题研究的产生和演变过程。本文回顾了这些研究的主要代表,如fracimdsamric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti和Franciszek Bujak对社会学的贡献。文章还关注了专题研究在立陶宛社会学中的地位,指出立陶宛有自己的专题研究历史,但这一研究并不属于社会学家分析的重点。这篇文章认为学术讨论的重要性是为了使立陶宛社会学的专题研究合法化,这将创造机会扩大作品的范围,纳入社会学历史,并在欧洲共同传统的背景下审视立陶宛农村研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monographic Research and its Place in Lithuanian Sociology
The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信