在加州平价医疗法案实施的早期,种族和民族在获得医疗服务方面的差异。

S. Charles, A. McEligot
{"title":"在加州平价医疗法案实施的早期,种族和民族在获得医疗服务方面的差异。","authors":"S. Charles, A. McEligot","doi":"10.32398/CJHP.V16I1.2122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose\nFollowing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance expansions, this study asks: did racial/ethnic group disparities in access to care remain? And specifically, did Latinos experience worse access to care after the ACA expansions compared to other racial/ethnic groups?\n\n\nMethods\nDataset: 2015 California Health Interview Survey (n=21,034; N=29,083,000). Participants: Adults, ages 18 and older, in California. Analyses: Bivariate chi-square tests and logistic multivariate regressions, including stratification by insurance.\n\n\nResults\nBivariate tests showed associations between racial/ethnic group and access to care. Latinos had lowest rates of having a usual source of care among uninsured (49.5%) and job-based coverage (85.2%). One-fifth of uninsured non-Latino whites (21%) report foregoing needed care. In the multivariate models, non-Latino whites had significantly higher odds of having a usual source of care (OR=1.32; p<0.05), but also of foregoing needed care (OR=1.43; p<0.05), than Latinos. Asian Americans had significantly lower odds of visiting a doctor in the past year (OR=0.65; p<0.05) than Latino adults.\n\n\nConclusion\nFollowing the ACA, disparities among racial/ethnic groups have become more complex. While Latino adults still have lower rates of having a usual source of care, Asian American adults have low rates of visiting a doctor, and non-Latino whites have high rates of foregoing needed care. Further research into the causes of difficulties in accessing care is needed, as health insurance expansions did not create health equity in solving access to care problems.","PeriodicalId":87431,"journal":{"name":"Californian journal of health promotion","volume":"1 1","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Care during the Early Years of Affordable Care Act Implementation in California.\",\"authors\":\"S. Charles, A. McEligot\",\"doi\":\"10.32398/CJHP.V16I1.2122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose\\nFollowing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance expansions, this study asks: did racial/ethnic group disparities in access to care remain? And specifically, did Latinos experience worse access to care after the ACA expansions compared to other racial/ethnic groups?\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nDataset: 2015 California Health Interview Survey (n=21,034; N=29,083,000). Participants: Adults, ages 18 and older, in California. Analyses: Bivariate chi-square tests and logistic multivariate regressions, including stratification by insurance.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nBivariate tests showed associations between racial/ethnic group and access to care. Latinos had lowest rates of having a usual source of care among uninsured (49.5%) and job-based coverage (85.2%). One-fifth of uninsured non-Latino whites (21%) report foregoing needed care. In the multivariate models, non-Latino whites had significantly higher odds of having a usual source of care (OR=1.32; p<0.05), but also of foregoing needed care (OR=1.43; p<0.05), than Latinos. Asian Americans had significantly lower odds of visiting a doctor in the past year (OR=0.65; p<0.05) than Latino adults.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nFollowing the ACA, disparities among racial/ethnic groups have become more complex. While Latino adults still have lower rates of having a usual source of care, Asian American adults have low rates of visiting a doctor, and non-Latino whites have high rates of foregoing needed care. Further research into the causes of difficulties in accessing care is needed, as health insurance expansions did not create health equity in solving access to care problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Californian journal of health promotion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"36-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Californian journal of health promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32398/CJHP.V16I1.2122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Californian journal of health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32398/CJHP.V16I1.2122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:在平价医疗法案(ACA)医疗保险扩大之后,本研究提出:种族/族裔群体在获得医疗服务方面的差异是否仍然存在?具体来说,与其他种族/族裔群体相比,在ACA扩大后,拉美裔人获得医疗服务的机会是否更差?方法数据集:2015年加州健康访谈调查(n= 21034;N = 29083000)。参与者:加利福尼亚州18岁及以上的成年人。分析:双变量卡方检验和logistic多变量回归,包括保险分层。结果双变量检验显示种族/民族与获得医疗服务之间存在关联。拉丁美洲人在无保险人群中拥有常规医疗来源的比例最低(49.5%),以工作为基础的覆盖率最低(85.2%)。五分之一没有保险的非拉丁裔白人(21%)报告说,他们没有必要的治疗。在多变量模型中,非拉丁裔白人拥有常规护理来源的几率显著更高(OR=1.32;p<0.05),但也有必要的护理(OR=1.43;p<0.05)。亚裔美国人在过去一年中看医生的几率明显较低(OR=0.65;p<0.05)。ACA实施后,种族/族裔群体之间的差异变得更加复杂。拉丁裔成年人接受常规医疗服务的比例仍然较低,亚裔美国成年人看医生的比例很低,而非拉丁裔白人接受必要医疗服务的比例很高。需要进一步研究难以获得保健服务的原因,因为扩大医疗保险并没有在解决获得保健服务的问题方面创造保健公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Care during the Early Years of Affordable Care Act Implementation in California.
Background and Purpose Following the Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance expansions, this study asks: did racial/ethnic group disparities in access to care remain? And specifically, did Latinos experience worse access to care after the ACA expansions compared to other racial/ethnic groups? Methods Dataset: 2015 California Health Interview Survey (n=21,034; N=29,083,000). Participants: Adults, ages 18 and older, in California. Analyses: Bivariate chi-square tests and logistic multivariate regressions, including stratification by insurance. Results Bivariate tests showed associations between racial/ethnic group and access to care. Latinos had lowest rates of having a usual source of care among uninsured (49.5%) and job-based coverage (85.2%). One-fifth of uninsured non-Latino whites (21%) report foregoing needed care. In the multivariate models, non-Latino whites had significantly higher odds of having a usual source of care (OR=1.32; p<0.05), but also of foregoing needed care (OR=1.43; p<0.05), than Latinos. Asian Americans had significantly lower odds of visiting a doctor in the past year (OR=0.65; p<0.05) than Latino adults. Conclusion Following the ACA, disparities among racial/ethnic groups have become more complex. While Latino adults still have lower rates of having a usual source of care, Asian American adults have low rates of visiting a doctor, and non-Latino whites have high rates of foregoing needed care. Further research into the causes of difficulties in accessing care is needed, as health insurance expansions did not create health equity in solving access to care problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信