某大城市两类路网路边露天微环境日间交通噪声水平分析

Anirban Chowdhury, A. Debsarkar, S. Chakrabarty
{"title":"某大城市两类路网路边露天微环境日间交通噪声水平分析","authors":"Anirban Chowdhury, A. Debsarkar, S. Chakrabarty","doi":"10.5455/JEOS.20151104102243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the research work is to critically analyze day time traffic noise level (Leq) at curbside open-air microenvironment of two types of road network of Kolkata City, India. Methods: 280 sets of data on road width, traffic volume, Leq, peak (L10) and background (L90) noise level were collected from curbsides of 23 major roads. The data was sub set according to the following road network types i.e., one-way traffic in single or double lane (RN-1) and both-way traffic in single lane (RN-2). Noise Climate (NC) and Traffic Noise Index (TNI) were computed for both types of road network. Results: After sub setting of data the number of sets of data accounted for 234 and 46 for RN-1 and RN-2 type of road network. The ratio (RN-1/RN-2) of the averages road width and traffic volume of two types of road network was 2.28 and 1.89. The ratio of the average Leq, NC and TNI of two type of road network was 0.98, 0.89 and 0.94. The ratio of the average L10 and L90 of two types of road network was 0.99, 1.01. Conclusion: RN-1 type of road network was wider and also had higher traffic volume in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. On the contrary RN-1 type of road network was quieter and less annoying in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. Lower Leq of RN-1 type of road network in spite of higher traffic volume was attributed to lower L10.","PeriodicalId":16086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","volume":"66 1","pages":"185-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical analysis of day time traffic noise level at curbside open-air microenvironment of two types of road network of a big city\",\"authors\":\"Anirban Chowdhury, A. Debsarkar, S. Chakrabarty\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JEOS.20151104102243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of the research work is to critically analyze day time traffic noise level (Leq) at curbside open-air microenvironment of two types of road network of Kolkata City, India. Methods: 280 sets of data on road width, traffic volume, Leq, peak (L10) and background (L90) noise level were collected from curbsides of 23 major roads. The data was sub set according to the following road network types i.e., one-way traffic in single or double lane (RN-1) and both-way traffic in single lane (RN-2). Noise Climate (NC) and Traffic Noise Index (TNI) were computed for both types of road network. Results: After sub setting of data the number of sets of data accounted for 234 and 46 for RN-1 and RN-2 type of road network. The ratio (RN-1/RN-2) of the averages road width and traffic volume of two types of road network was 2.28 and 1.89. The ratio of the average Leq, NC and TNI of two type of road network was 0.98, 0.89 and 0.94. The ratio of the average L10 and L90 of two types of road network was 0.99, 1.01. Conclusion: RN-1 type of road network was wider and also had higher traffic volume in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. On the contrary RN-1 type of road network was quieter and less annoying in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. Lower Leq of RN-1 type of road network in spite of higher traffic volume was attributed to lower L10.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"185-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEOS.20151104102243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEOS.20151104102243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是批判性地分析印度加尔各答市两种类型道路网的路边露天微环境的日间交通噪声水平(Leq)。方法:采集23条主干道路边280组道路宽度、车流量、Leq、峰值噪声(L10)和背景噪声(L90)数据。数据按路网类型进行分组,即单双车道单向交通(RN-1)和单车道双向交通(RN-2)。计算了两类路网的噪声气候(NC)和交通噪声指数(TNI)。结果:数据分组后,RN-1型和RN-2型路网的数据组数分别为234组和46组。两类路网的平均道路宽度与交通量之比(RN-1/RN-2)分别为2.28和1.89。两类路网的平均Leq、NC和TNI之比分别为0.98、0.89和0.94。两类路网的平均L10与L90之比分别为0.99、1.01。结论:与RN-2型路网相比,RN-1型路网更宽,交通量也更高。相反,与RN-2型路网相比,RN-1型路网更安静,更少烦人。尽管交通量较高,但RN-1型路网的Leq较低归因于L10较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical analysis of day time traffic noise level at curbside open-air microenvironment of two types of road network of a big city
Aim: The aim of the research work is to critically analyze day time traffic noise level (Leq) at curbside open-air microenvironment of two types of road network of Kolkata City, India. Methods: 280 sets of data on road width, traffic volume, Leq, peak (L10) and background (L90) noise level were collected from curbsides of 23 major roads. The data was sub set according to the following road network types i.e., one-way traffic in single or double lane (RN-1) and both-way traffic in single lane (RN-2). Noise Climate (NC) and Traffic Noise Index (TNI) were computed for both types of road network. Results: After sub setting of data the number of sets of data accounted for 234 and 46 for RN-1 and RN-2 type of road network. The ratio (RN-1/RN-2) of the averages road width and traffic volume of two types of road network was 2.28 and 1.89. The ratio of the average Leq, NC and TNI of two type of road network was 0.98, 0.89 and 0.94. The ratio of the average L10 and L90 of two types of road network was 0.99, 1.01. Conclusion: RN-1 type of road network was wider and also had higher traffic volume in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. On the contrary RN-1 type of road network was quieter and less annoying in comparison with RN-2 type of road network. Lower Leq of RN-1 type of road network in spite of higher traffic volume was attributed to lower L10.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信