YouTube上关于牙齿矫正器的视频的内容质量与牙医和正畸医生的观点不同吗?

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
S. Sadry, S. E. Meseli, Ece Buyukbasaran
{"title":"YouTube上关于牙齿矫正器的视频的内容质量与牙医和正畸医生的观点不同吗?","authors":"S. Sadry, S. E. Meseli, Ece Buyukbasaran","doi":"10.25259/apos_14_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aimed to content quality analysis of YouTube videos about aligners in orthodontics by a dentist and by an orthodontist.\n\n\n\nConsidering the Google Trends analysis, the “aligner,” as the most searched keyword about aligners in orthodontics, was chosen for YouTube searching. A total of 39 included videos were watched for one time by a dentist and orthodontist. Time since upload, video duration, number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments were recorded. Moreover, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated and the reliability score, video content quality (VCQ), video interaction and quality index (VIQI), and global quality scales (GQS) were recorded by both viewers. Interobserver agreement levels were interpreted with the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and data were evaluated at P < 0.05 as the statistically significant level.\n\n\n\nThe results showed that most of the included videos (48.71%) were uploaded by dental companies. However, the averages of VCQ in terms of uploaders were similar for both viewers. The agreement level in all videos between orthodontist and dentist was “good” level at VIQI (CCC = 0.965) and GQS (CCC = 0.943), whereas it was “very poor” level on VCQ (CCC = 0.653).\n\n\n\nThe findings revealed that YouTube video contents about aligners provide moderate information and VCQ, independently from viewers, is similar among uploaders. The agreement levels between dentist and orthodontist on the evaluation of audiovisual quality of the videos were good, whereas this level was poor on the evaluation of information quality of videos.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the content quality of YouTube videos about aligners differ from the perspectives of dentists and orthodontists?\",\"authors\":\"S. Sadry, S. E. Meseli, Ece Buyukbasaran\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/apos_14_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThis study aimed to content quality analysis of YouTube videos about aligners in orthodontics by a dentist and by an orthodontist.\\n\\n\\n\\nConsidering the Google Trends analysis, the “aligner,” as the most searched keyword about aligners in orthodontics, was chosen for YouTube searching. A total of 39 included videos were watched for one time by a dentist and orthodontist. Time since upload, video duration, number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments were recorded. Moreover, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated and the reliability score, video content quality (VCQ), video interaction and quality index (VIQI), and global quality scales (GQS) were recorded by both viewers. Interobserver agreement levels were interpreted with the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and data were evaluated at P < 0.05 as the statistically significant level.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe results showed that most of the included videos (48.71%) were uploaded by dental companies. However, the averages of VCQ in terms of uploaders were similar for both viewers. The agreement level in all videos between orthodontist and dentist was “good” level at VIQI (CCC = 0.965) and GQS (CCC = 0.943), whereas it was “very poor” level on VCQ (CCC = 0.653).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe findings revealed that YouTube video contents about aligners provide moderate information and VCQ, independently from viewers, is similar among uploaders. The agreement levels between dentist and orthodontist on the evaluation of audiovisual quality of the videos were good, whereas this level was poor on the evaluation of information quality of videos.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"APOS Trends in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"APOS Trends in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_14_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_14_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对一名牙医和一名正畸医生在正畸治疗中使用矫正器的YouTube视频进行内容质量分析。考虑到谷歌趋势的分析,在YouTube搜索中选择了“牙齿矫正器”,这是关于牙齿矫正器的搜索次数最多的关键词。一名牙医和一名正畸医生观看了总共39个包含的视频。记录上传时间、视频时长、观看次数、喜欢次数、不喜欢次数和评论次数。计算交互指数和观看率,并记录两名观看者的可靠性评分、视频内容质量(VCQ)、视频交互与质量指数(VIQI)和整体质量量表(GQS)。观察者间一致水平用一致性相关系数(CCC)解释,以P < 0.05为显著水平。结果显示,大部分视频(48.71%)是由牙科公司上传的。然而,就上传者而言,两个观看者的VCQ平均值是相似的。正畸医师与牙医师视频的一致性在VIQI (CCC = 0.965)和GQS (CCC = 0.943)上均为“良好”水平,在VCQ (CCC = 0.653)上均为“非常差”水平。研究结果显示,YouTube上关于对齐器的视频内容提供了适度的信息,而VCQ在上传者之间是相似的,独立于观看者。牙医和正畸医师对视频视听质量评价的一致程度较好,而对视频信息质量评价的一致程度较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the content quality of YouTube videos about aligners differ from the perspectives of dentists and orthodontists?
This study aimed to content quality analysis of YouTube videos about aligners in orthodontics by a dentist and by an orthodontist. Considering the Google Trends analysis, the “aligner,” as the most searched keyword about aligners in orthodontics, was chosen for YouTube searching. A total of 39 included videos were watched for one time by a dentist and orthodontist. Time since upload, video duration, number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments were recorded. Moreover, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated and the reliability score, video content quality (VCQ), video interaction and quality index (VIQI), and global quality scales (GQS) were recorded by both viewers. Interobserver agreement levels were interpreted with the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and data were evaluated at P < 0.05 as the statistically significant level. The results showed that most of the included videos (48.71%) were uploaded by dental companies. However, the averages of VCQ in terms of uploaders were similar for both viewers. The agreement level in all videos between orthodontist and dentist was “good” level at VIQI (CCC = 0.965) and GQS (CCC = 0.943), whereas it was “very poor” level on VCQ (CCC = 0.653). The findings revealed that YouTube video contents about aligners provide moderate information and VCQ, independently from viewers, is similar among uploaders. The agreement levels between dentist and orthodontist on the evaluation of audiovisual quality of the videos were good, whereas this level was poor on the evaluation of information quality of videos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信