兽医专业人员在提供动物临终关怀和姑息治疗时与人类护理人员的经验

Heath C. Hoffmann, G. Dickinson
{"title":"兽医专业人员在提供动物临终关怀和姑息治疗时与人类护理人员的经验","authors":"Heath C. Hoffmann, G. Dickinson","doi":"10.1079/hai.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n A significant role in veterinary medical practices is the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care to pets and their clients. Yet, U.S. veterinarians report being dissatisfied with the level of training they receive on EOL issues in their veterinary medical programs (\n Dickinson et al., 2011\n ). At the same time, the ubiquity of veterinary information on the Internet (e.g., “Dr. Google”) has the potential for instilling pet owners with a false sense of expertise that veterinarians must then negotiate when providing EOL care. In this context, we surveyed 86 veterinary members of the International Association for Animal Hospice and Palliative Care (IAAHPC) to explore whether and/or how veterinary medical information clients obtain from the Internet impacts the veterinarians’ delivery of EOL care to those clients’ pets; we similarly investigate the information that veterinarians prefer their clients knew before meeting with them to provide EOL care. In light of the inherent challenges of EOL veterinary care outlined above, we learn from veterinarians what they feel are the most challenging and rewarding aspects of providing palliative and hospice care. Using qualitative thematic coding, our results show, in sum, that veterinary information from the Internet is both helpful and harmful to veterinarian interactions with clients; veterinarians wished clients understood the value of hospice and palliative care as an EOL care option and that grief is normal; and veterinarians report a most positive aspect of dealing with these issues is the gratitude clients show for helping their pets die peacefully.\n","PeriodicalId":90845,"journal":{"name":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterinary professionals’ experiences with human caregivers when providing animal hospice and palliative care\",\"authors\":\"Heath C. Hoffmann, G. Dickinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/hai.2021.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n A significant role in veterinary medical practices is the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care to pets and their clients. Yet, U.S. veterinarians report being dissatisfied with the level of training they receive on EOL issues in their veterinary medical programs (\\n Dickinson et al., 2011\\n ). At the same time, the ubiquity of veterinary information on the Internet (e.g., “Dr. Google”) has the potential for instilling pet owners with a false sense of expertise that veterinarians must then negotiate when providing EOL care. In this context, we surveyed 86 veterinary members of the International Association for Animal Hospice and Palliative Care (IAAHPC) to explore whether and/or how veterinary medical information clients obtain from the Internet impacts the veterinarians’ delivery of EOL care to those clients’ pets; we similarly investigate the information that veterinarians prefer their clients knew before meeting with them to provide EOL care. In light of the inherent challenges of EOL veterinary care outlined above, we learn from veterinarians what they feel are the most challenging and rewarding aspects of providing palliative and hospice care. Using qualitative thematic coding, our results show, in sum, that veterinary information from the Internet is both helpful and harmful to veterinarian interactions with clients; veterinarians wished clients understood the value of hospice and palliative care as an EOL care option and that grief is normal; and veterinarians report a most positive aspect of dealing with these issues is the gratitude clients show for helping their pets die peacefully.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":90845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-animal interaction bulletin\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-animal interaction bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2021.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-animal interaction bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2021.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

兽医医学实践中的一个重要作用是为宠物及其客户提供生命终结(EOL)护理。然而,美国兽医报告对他们在兽医项目中接受的EOL问题培训水平不满意(Dickinson et al., 2011)。与此同时,互联网上无处不在的兽医信息(例如“Dr. b谷歌”)有可能给宠物主人灌输一种错误的专业知识,即兽医在提供EOL护理时必须与之协商。在此背景下,我们调查了国际动物临终关怀和姑息治疗协会(IAAHPC)的86名兽医成员,以探讨客户从互联网获取的兽医信息是否和/或如何影响兽医对客户宠物的EOL护理;我们同样调查兽医希望他们的客户在与他们会面提供EOL护理之前知道的信息。鉴于上述EOL兽医护理的固有挑战,我们从兽医那里了解到他们认为提供姑息治疗和临终关怀最具挑战性和最有价值的方面。使用定性主题编码,我们的结果表明,总的来说,来自互联网的兽医信息对兽医与客户的互动既有益又有害;兽医希望客户了解临终关怀和姑息治疗作为EOL护理选择的价值,并且悲伤是正常的;兽医报告说,处理这些问题最积极的一面是客户对帮助他们的宠物平静地死去表示感谢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Veterinary professionals’ experiences with human caregivers when providing animal hospice and palliative care
A significant role in veterinary medical practices is the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care to pets and their clients. Yet, U.S. veterinarians report being dissatisfied with the level of training they receive on EOL issues in their veterinary medical programs ( Dickinson et al., 2011 ). At the same time, the ubiquity of veterinary information on the Internet (e.g., “Dr. Google”) has the potential for instilling pet owners with a false sense of expertise that veterinarians must then negotiate when providing EOL care. In this context, we surveyed 86 veterinary members of the International Association for Animal Hospice and Palliative Care (IAAHPC) to explore whether and/or how veterinary medical information clients obtain from the Internet impacts the veterinarians’ delivery of EOL care to those clients’ pets; we similarly investigate the information that veterinarians prefer their clients knew before meeting with them to provide EOL care. In light of the inherent challenges of EOL veterinary care outlined above, we learn from veterinarians what they feel are the most challenging and rewarding aspects of providing palliative and hospice care. Using qualitative thematic coding, our results show, in sum, that veterinary information from the Internet is both helpful and harmful to veterinarian interactions with clients; veterinarians wished clients understood the value of hospice and palliative care as an EOL care option and that grief is normal; and veterinarians report a most positive aspect of dealing with these issues is the gratitude clients show for helping their pets die peacefully.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信