英国与中国现行教育纪律制度比较研究

Kaiyi Yang, Danjv Qiao
{"title":"英国与中国现行教育纪律制度比较研究","authors":"Kaiyi Yang, Danjv Qiao","doi":"10.20849/jed.v6i4.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Chinese Education Disciplinary Rules for Primary and Secondary Schools (Trial), i.e., The Trial Rules (TTR) was first put into practice, its implementation has been limited because of teachers’ ignorance and misconduct. A comparative study is needed to shed light on these issues and promote TTR policies. As a country based on case law and a centralised educational system, England represents an appropriate reference. The present study compares the history and latest regulations in education between two countries (England and China) in terms of the participants and processes involved in education discipline. It is important to note that TTR has a shorter history than the system in England, and therefore, it provides relatively limited guidance for classroom teachers because there has not been enough practical or theoretical feedback. However, considering the regulations about the education disciplinary process (e.g., deviance, discipline, and feedback), TTR has formed a relatively well-developed stipulations for the latter two steps, while further details must be developed to better address deviance. Overall, more referential cases are needed as guidance for teachers.","PeriodicalId":29977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Current Education Disciplinary Regulations in England Versus China\",\"authors\":\"Kaiyi Yang, Danjv Qiao\",\"doi\":\"10.20849/jed.v6i4.1290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Chinese Education Disciplinary Rules for Primary and Secondary Schools (Trial), i.e., The Trial Rules (TTR) was first put into practice, its implementation has been limited because of teachers’ ignorance and misconduct. A comparative study is needed to shed light on these issues and promote TTR policies. As a country based on case law and a centralised educational system, England represents an appropriate reference. The present study compares the history and latest regulations in education between two countries (England and China) in terms of the participants and processes involved in education discipline. It is important to note that TTR has a shorter history than the system in England, and therefore, it provides relatively limited guidance for classroom teachers because there has not been enough practical or theoretical feedback. However, considering the regulations about the education disciplinary process (e.g., deviance, discipline, and feedback), TTR has formed a relatively well-developed stipulations for the latter two steps, while further details must be developed to better address deviance. Overall, more referential cases are needed as guidance for teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v6i4.1290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v6i4.1290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《中国中小学教育纪律规则(试行)》即《试行规则》(TTR)自实施以来,由于教师的无知和不当行为,其实施受到了限制。需要进行比较研究,以阐明这些问题,并促进TTR政策。作为一个以判例法和中央集权教育体系为基础的国家,英国是一个合适的参考。本研究从教育学科的参与者和过程两方面比较了中英两国的教育历史和最新的教育规则。值得注意的是,与英国相比,TTR的历史较短,因此,由于没有足够的实践或理论反馈,它对课堂教师的指导相对有限。然而,考虑到教育惩戒过程的规定(如偏差、纪律和反馈),TTR对后两个步骤已经形成了比较完善的规定,但需要进一步制定细节来更好地解决偏差。总体而言,需要更多的参考案例作为教师的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of the Current Education Disciplinary Regulations in England Versus China
Since the Chinese Education Disciplinary Rules for Primary and Secondary Schools (Trial), i.e., The Trial Rules (TTR) was first put into practice, its implementation has been limited because of teachers’ ignorance and misconduct. A comparative study is needed to shed light on these issues and promote TTR policies. As a country based on case law and a centralised educational system, England represents an appropriate reference. The present study compares the history and latest regulations in education between two countries (England and China) in terms of the participants and processes involved in education discipline. It is important to note that TTR has a shorter history than the system in England, and therefore, it provides relatively limited guidance for classroom teachers because there has not been enough practical or theoretical feedback. However, considering the regulations about the education disciplinary process (e.g., deviance, discipline, and feedback), TTR has formed a relatively well-developed stipulations for the latter two steps, while further details must be developed to better address deviance. Overall, more referential cases are needed as guidance for teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信