脑瘫患儿下肢肉毒毒素注射后常规物理治疗方法与机器人辅助步态训练效果的比较:前瞻性随机对照研究

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Ayşe Güç, M. Çebiçci, S. Sütbeyaz, H. Çalış, Hanife Abakay
{"title":"脑瘫患儿下肢肉毒毒素注射后常规物理治疗方法与机器人辅助步态训练效果的比较:前瞻性随机对照研究","authors":"Ayşe Güç, M. Çebiçci, S. Sütbeyaz, H. Çalış, Hanife Abakay","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are increasing numbers of studies regarding robot-assisted gait training thanks to technological developments and whether it is superior to conventional physiotherapy methods draws attention. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy receiving botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities. A total of 28 patients who were followed up in our clinic and had received botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in the last month were randomized into two groups in the study. First group received conventional physiotherapy (range of joint motion (ROM), stretching, gait training, etc.), and the other group received robot-assisted gait training. The study population was evaluated pre- and posttreatment regarding their ROM, spasticity, gross motor function, balance, functional independence, and gait analyses. When we look at the responses of the patients before and after treatment, a statistically significant change was observed in all fields when comparing before treatment with after treatment ( p  <  0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. We find that both conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted treatments after botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy were efficient; however, one of both methods was not superior to the other. In addition, further large-scale studies with long-term follow-ups on the comparison of treatment methods are needed.","PeriodicalId":16729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric neurology","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Conventional Physiotherapy Methods and Robot-Assisted Gait Training after Botulinum Toxin Injection of Lower Extremities in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Güç, M. Çebiçci, S. Sütbeyaz, H. Çalış, Hanife Abakay\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1769737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There are increasing numbers of studies regarding robot-assisted gait training thanks to technological developments and whether it is superior to conventional physiotherapy methods draws attention. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy receiving botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities. A total of 28 patients who were followed up in our clinic and had received botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in the last month were randomized into two groups in the study. First group received conventional physiotherapy (range of joint motion (ROM), stretching, gait training, etc.), and the other group received robot-assisted gait training. The study population was evaluated pre- and posttreatment regarding their ROM, spasticity, gross motor function, balance, functional independence, and gait analyses. When we look at the responses of the patients before and after treatment, a statistically significant change was observed in all fields when comparing before treatment with after treatment ( p  <  0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. We find that both conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted treatments after botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy were efficient; however, one of both methods was not superior to the other. In addition, further large-scale studies with long-term follow-ups on the comparison of treatment methods are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric neurology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术的发展,机器人辅助步态训练的研究越来越多,其是否优于传统的物理治疗方法引起了人们的关注。本研究旨在比较常规物理治疗方法和机器人辅助步态训练对脑瘫患儿下肢肉毒毒素注射的效果。本研究将28例近一个月在我诊所随访并接受过下肢肉毒毒素注射的患者随机分为两组。第一组接受常规物理治疗(关节活动度、拉伸、步态训练等),另一组接受机器人辅助步态训练。对研究人群进行治疗前后的ROM、痉挛、大运动功能、平衡、功能独立性和步态分析。观察患者治疗前后的反应,治疗前后各方面差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究发现,脑瘫患儿下肢注射肉毒杆菌毒素后,常规物理治疗方法和机器人辅助治疗均有效;然而,两种方法中的一种并不优于另一种。此外,还需要对治疗方法的比较进行更大规模的长期随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Conventional Physiotherapy Methods and Robot-Assisted Gait Training after Botulinum Toxin Injection of Lower Extremities in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Abstract There are increasing numbers of studies regarding robot-assisted gait training thanks to technological developments and whether it is superior to conventional physiotherapy methods draws attention. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy receiving botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities. A total of 28 patients who were followed up in our clinic and had received botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in the last month were randomized into two groups in the study. First group received conventional physiotherapy (range of joint motion (ROM), stretching, gait training, etc.), and the other group received robot-assisted gait training. The study population was evaluated pre- and posttreatment regarding their ROM, spasticity, gross motor function, balance, functional independence, and gait analyses. When we look at the responses of the patients before and after treatment, a statistically significant change was observed in all fields when comparing before treatment with after treatment ( p  <  0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. We find that both conventional physiotherapy methods and robot-assisted treatments after botulinum toxin injection of lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy were efficient; however, one of both methods was not superior to the other. In addition, further large-scale studies with long-term follow-ups on the comparison of treatment methods are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Neurology is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed medical journal publishing articles in the fields of childhood neurology, pediatric neurosurgery, pediatric neuroradiology, child psychiatry and pediatric neuroscience. The Journal of Pediatric Neurology, the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Science of the Yüzüncü Yil University in Turkiye, encourages submissions from authors throughout the world. The following articles will be considered for publication: editorials, original and review articles, rapid communications, case reports, neuroimage of the month, letters to the editor and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信